简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
US SEC Charges 18 for Hacking Retail Brokerage Accounts to Buy Microcap Stocks
Abstract:The individuals gained over $1 million in illicit profit from the unauthorized purchases. The SEC described the cross-border scheme as 'brazen and sophisticated'.

On Monday, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged 18 persons and entities for their involvement in a fraudulent scheme that involved hacking dozens of online retail brokerage accounts.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London. This year we have expanded to new verticals in Online Trading, Fintech, Digital Assets, Blockchain, and Payments.
The hack, which happened between late 2017 and early 2018, was allegedly coordinated by Rahim Mohamed based in Alberta, Canada.
Several other individuals within and outside the US participated in or benefited from the scheme, the SEC said.
The US regulator disclosed the details of the case on Monday in a press statement published on its website.
“The SECs complaint charges violations of the antifraud and beneficial ownership reporting provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and names two relief defendants who received proceeds from the hacks,” the regulator said.
The regulator said the individuals made over $1 million in illicit profit by using at least 31 hacked accounts to buy microcap stocks of Lotus Bio-Technology Development Corp. (LBTD) and Good Gaming, Inc.
While LBTD is a biotechnology company that operates in the US and China, Good Gaming is an interactive entertainment company.
The SEC said the hackers made a profit by manipulating the price and trading volume of these firms' stocks.
“The unauthorized purchases allegedly enabled fraudsters, who already controlled large blocks of Lotus Bio-Techand Good Gaming stock, to sell their holdings at artificially high prices and reap more than $1 million in illicit proceeds.”
The SEC said its goal is to secure “the return of ill-gotten gains plus interest, penalties, bars and other equitable relief.”
‘Brazen and Sophisticated Scheme’
Additionally, the SEC fingered Davies Wong based in British Columbia, Canada, and Glenn Laken, based in Illinois, the United States, in the case.
Another individual based in British Columbia, Richard Tang, is said to be involved in the schemes involving the two companies.
According to the SEC, while Wong had the majority share in LBTD, Laken commanded the same in Good Gaming. And, they both allegedly cooperated with Mohammed in orchestrating the attack.
Speaking on the case, Gurbir Grewal, the Director of the SECs Division of Enforcement, urged investors to remain vigilant.
“The SEC remains committed to rooting out this type of wrongdoing. Investors should also take precautions, including choosing strong passwords, using different passwords for different accounts and using two-factor authentication when available,” Grewal said.
On her part, Nekia Jones, the Director of the SEC‘s Atlanta Regional Office, noted that the charges against the individuals prove the regulator’s ability to root out complex cross-border schemes.
“Our complaint details a brazen and sophisticated scheme, with hackers using international accounts and dummy account holders to hide their tracks,” Jones said.
Other Recent Cases
Meanwhile, the SEC at the beginning of this month charged four co-founders and seven other individuals before the United States District Court in the Northern District of Illinois for their involvement in a $300 million crypto pyramid scheme.
This case, too, had an international outlook with the co-founders being based in Russia, Georgia and Indonesia, as well as three promoters in the United States.
Last month, the securities market watchdog filed charges against nine people in three cases involving over $6.8 million.
Amit Bhardwaj, a former Chief Information Security Officer, Brijesh Goel, an investment banker, and Seth Markin, a former Federal Bureau of Investigation trainee, were involved in the cases.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Voices of the Golden Insight Award Jury | Kazuaki Takabatake, CCO of Titan FX
WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr
