WikiFX Spring Festival Message | Grounded in Transparency, Walking with Trust
As the Lunar New Year approaches, renewal is in the air. It is a moment to bid farewell to the old, welcome the new, and reflect while moving forward.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:TradeZero will pay $100,000 for allegedly misleading investors about stock trading halts
TradeZero America has settled its dispute with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Committee (SEC)
The agency accused the trading platform of misleading investors about meme stock trading halts
TradeZero denied these allegations but proposed a settlement of $100,000

An interesting chapter in meme stock history closed today. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission accused commission-free trading platform TradeZero America of providing false information to investors. The allegations are that TradeZero and its CEO Daniel Pipitone falsely told investors that TradeZero never restricted the trading of meme stocks in 2021. Over a year later, civil charges have been brought against the company and settled.
Neither Pipitone nor TradeZero have admitted any wrongdoing. But the company has agreed to pay penalties of $100,000 and Pipitone will pay $25,000.
The SEC alleges that the trading halt took place on Jan. 28, 2021. This date marks the height of the year’s iconic meme stock frenzy. According to regulators, TradeZero halted trading of GameStop (NYSE:GME), AMC Entertainment (NYSE:AMC) and Koss (NASDAQ:KOSS) for roughly 10 minutes, following direction from its clearing broker.
Reuters reports that the platform “later told investors it had resisted the halts.”
In its filing, the SEC highlighted an “ask me anything” session that Pipitone conducted on Reddit in which he discussed the trading halt. Allegedly, he stated that “some trading firms are blocking these symbols is disgusting, unprecedented. … Our clearing firm tried to make us block you and we refused. After three hours on the phone they backed down.”
However, the SEC says Pipitone “failed to disclose that TradeZero did comply with the clearing broker‘s demands and shut off its customers’ ability to purchase three securities in question for a period of time.”
According to Melissa Hodgman, associate director of the SECs enforcement division, “This case sends a powerful message that participants in our capital markets cannot exploit market turbulence to deceive customers.”
But many investors dont agree that the punishment fits the crime.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

As the Lunar New Year approaches, renewal is in the air. It is a moment to bid farewell to the old, welcome the new, and reflect while moving forward.

XSpot Wealth has found many negative comments from traders who have allegedly been deceived by the broker. Traders constantly accuse the broker of causing unnecessary withdrawal blocks and forcing them to continue depositing with it. Many user complaints emerged on WikiFX, a leading global forex regulation inquiry app. In this XSpot Wealth review article, we have investigated multiple complaints against the broker. Read on!

Did SEVEN STAR FX make unreasonable verification requests and block your forex trading account later? Did the broker prevent you from accessing fund withdrawals? Were you made to wait for a long time to receive a response from the broker’s customer support official? Have you had to seek legal assistance to recover your stuck funds? Well, these are some claims made by SEVEN STAR FX’s traders. In this SEVEN STAR FX review article, we have looked closely at the company’s operation, the list of complaints, and a take on its regulatory status. Keep reading to know the same.

When traders search for "Is ZarVista Safe or Scam," they want to know if their capital will be safe. Nice features and bonuses do not matter much if you can't trust the broker. This article skips the marketing talk and looks at real evidence about ZarVista's reputation. We want to examine actual user reviews, look into the many ZarVista Complaints, and check the broker's legal status to get a clear picture. The evidence we found shows serious warning signs and a pattern of major user problems, especially about the safety and access to funds. This report gives you the information you need to make a smart decision about this risky broker.