WikiFX Spring Festival Message | Grounded in Transparency, Walking with Trust
As the Lunar New Year approaches, renewal is in the air. It is a moment to bid farewell to the old, welcome the new, and reflect while moving forward.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The Australian Federal Court ruled that social media 'influencer' Tyson Robert Scholz violated s911A of the Corporations Act by operating a financial services firm without an Australian financial services license between March 2020 and November 2021.

Mr. Scholz was accused of carrying on a financial services business without a license by delivering training courses and seminars about trading in ASX-listed securities, during which he made recommendations about share purchases, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). Using the name '@ASXWOLF TS,' I'm promoting those courses and seminars on Twitter and Instagram. Making share purchasing suggestions on private internet forums (which he ran) and on Instagram.
Mr. Scholz's offering to paying subscribers included:
subscription/membership fees of $500, $1,000, or $1,500
offers of various levels of share trading training referred to as ‘Stage 1’, and ‘Stage 3’ packages, which were marketed as introductory or advanced seminars
offers of individual one-off share trading suggestions, or tips for a fee
the Stage 2 package provides one year‘s access to a private chat site, named ’Black Wolf Pit, using the online communications platform Discord.
The case will be scheduled for a case management hearing on January 31, 2023, followed by a subsequent hearing to address any outstanding problems, including any orders prohibiting Mr. Scholz from doing financial services without a license.
ASIC is seeking orders prohibiting Mr. Scholz from:
promoting or carrying on the business of providing recommendations or statements of opinions about the purchase of shares in return for payments of money or other benefits
directly or indirectly carrying on any financial services business in Australia
receiving, soliciting, transferring, or disposing of customer funds received in connection to providing recommendations or opinions about the purchase of shares.
The financial product advice supplied by Mr. Scholz was an intrinsic component of this company,' her Honour Justice Downes noted in her conclusion. His advice was not one-time, but rather part of the ongoing and systematic commercial activities from which Mr. Scholz profited.
Through his Instagram lifestyle and 'life story' postings, Mr. Scholz had created a reputation as a successful share trader with the capacity to discover attractive firms in which to invest. It didn't matter that the pieces made no overt suggestion to buy the shares: it was enough that Mr. Scholz mentioned a firm or its stock in the tales, generally in a manner that suggested that he loved that company.'
ASIC filed proceedings in the Federal Court in December 2021 seeking orders prohibiting Mr. Scholz from advertising or carrying on any financial services activity in Australia. On December 16, 2021, the Federal Court issued cooperation orders prohibiting Mr. Scholz from marketing or carrying on a financial services firm. Those orders were issued until the Court's decision on ASIC's request for a permanent injunction, which was heard in a contentious hearing in October 2022.
Find out more of ASX news here: https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/4321685308.html

Stay tuned for more Forex News.
Use the download link below to download and install WikiFX App on your mobile phones to stay updated on the latest news, even on the go.
Download link: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

As the Lunar New Year approaches, renewal is in the air. It is a moment to bid farewell to the old, welcome the new, and reflect while moving forward.

XSpot Wealth has found many negative comments from traders who have allegedly been deceived by the broker. Traders constantly accuse the broker of causing unnecessary withdrawal blocks and forcing them to continue depositing with it. Many user complaints emerged on WikiFX, a leading global forex regulation inquiry app. In this XSpot Wealth review article, we have investigated multiple complaints against the broker. Read on!

Did SEVEN STAR FX make unreasonable verification requests and block your forex trading account later? Did the broker prevent you from accessing fund withdrawals? Were you made to wait for a long time to receive a response from the broker’s customer support official? Have you had to seek legal assistance to recover your stuck funds? Well, these are some claims made by SEVEN STAR FX’s traders. In this SEVEN STAR FX review article, we have looked closely at the company’s operation, the list of complaints, and a take on its regulatory status. Keep reading to know the same.

When traders search for "Is ZarVista Safe or Scam," they want to know if their capital will be safe. Nice features and bonuses do not matter much if you can't trust the broker. This article skips the marketing talk and looks at real evidence about ZarVista's reputation. We want to examine actual user reviews, look into the many ZarVista Complaints, and check the broker's legal status to get a clear picture. The evidence we found shows serious warning signs and a pattern of major user problems, especially about the safety and access to funds. This report gives you the information you need to make a smart decision about this risky broker.