简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Investors and Global Brokerage Known As FXCM Inc. Need More Time To Discuss Class Action Settlement
Abstract:Global Brokerage Inc, previously known as FXCM Inc, and the plaintiffs in a securities class action claim that additional time is needed to negotiate a settlement. This is evident from a letter filed by Global Brokerage on January 26, 2023, with the New York Southern District Court.

Global Brokerage Inc, previously known as FXCM Inc, and the plaintiffs in a securities class action claim that additional time is needed to negotiate a settlement. This is evident from a letter filed by Global Brokerage on January 26, 2023, with the New York Southern District Court.
The parties in this dispute seek an extension of one week, until February 3, 2023, for submitting the Stipulation of Settlement and a petition for preliminary approval of the settlement. This is the second request for a time extension. The initial request was granted by the Court, and the current deadline is January 27, 2023. Although significant progress has been achieved, and the parties are on the verge of addressing the main concerns affecting the settlement, more time is required to finish the settlement papers.
Because of the parties' agreement in principle to settle this matter, the securities class action against Global Brokerage, Inc., previously known as FXCM, Inc., Dror Niv, and William Ahdout has been staying since December 23, 2022.
Let us remember that the plaintiffs, in this case, include (among others): 683 Capital Partners, LP the lead plaintiff, while Shipco Transport Inc. and E-Global Trade and Finance Group, Inc. are class representatives.
Plaintiffs sue FXCM, Dror Niv, and William Ahdout under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 established thereunder. Shipco and E-Global file claims on behalf of themselves and a certified Class that includes “all persons and/or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded Global Brokerage, Inc., f/k/a FXCM Inc. (”FXCM“) Class A common stock between March 15, 2012, and February 6, 2017, both dates inclusive.” 683 Capital brings its claims one at a time.
The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants engaged in securities fraud by misrepresenting and omitting significant information concerning FXCM's covert connection with Effex Capital, LLC. FXCM provided foreign currency trading to retail consumers, advertising their “No Dealing Desk” or “agency model,” in which FXCM linked the user with a liquidity provider delivering the best price, with FXCM simply adding a mark-up to the price as a fee.
According to the plaintiffs, FXCM was surreptitiously collecting kickbacks of around 70% of trading profits from Effex, one of FXCM's key liquidity suppliers who was trading against FXCM's clients, unknown to FXCM's customers and investors.
Effex was headed by John Dittami, whom Defendants Niv and Ahdout employed at FXCM to establish an internal trading system, EES, that would compete with external market makers, according to the plaintiffs' complaint. The deal Dittami signed with FXCM called for a 70-30 split of EES's trading proceeds (70% to FXCM). Defendants chose to spin out EES as Effex since FXCM's compliance staff determined that FXCM could not honestly claim to be running an agency model if EES was trading against FXCM's clients. FXCM and Effex, on the other hand, preserved the 70-30 split of trading profits—Effex replacing Dittami and FXCM preserving its 70% share—which they disguised as “compensation for order flow.” For years, FXCM gave essential assistance to Effex, and Effex depended on FXCM to remain afloat.
Effex became one of FXCM's largest liquidity suppliers, and Defendants offered unique trading benefits in order to push more of FXCM's trading activity to Effex.
The National Futures Association (NFA) and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) started looking into FXCM's association with Effex in 2013 and 2014. The NFA and CFTC announced regulatory settlements with the defendants on February 6, 2017, after the conclusion of trade, confirming the previously unknown link between FXCM and Effex and imposing heavy fines. The following day, the price of FXCM shares plummeted, causing the Plaintiffs and the Class to suffer.
Keep an eye out for more Forex Broker news.
Install the WikiFX App on your smartphone to keep up to speed on current events.
Download link: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Charles Schwab Review: Traders Claim Illegitimate Profit Cancellation, Trade Manipulation & More
Have you been lured into the Charles Schwab app for trading on the back of outrageous profit claims by the broker? Did you fail to receive any of these? Does the broker deny withdrawals every time you request and cancel your forex trading account? Have you been victimized financially by its trade manipulation? Act before you are left with a NIL balance in your account. Many traders have questioned Charles Schwab customer service and many other operational executives for the aforementioned illegitimate trading activities. In this Charles Schwab review article, we have shared some of their comments. Read on!

AMP Futures Exposed: Traders Raise Alarms Over Illegitimate Account Blocks & Bad Customer Service
Has AMP Futures blocked your forex trading account? Does it fail to provide any explanation for this act? Do you face issues concerning deposits to your AMP Futures account? Is the customer service non-existent for any trading query you raise with it? You are not alone! Many traders have been facing these issues upon AMP Futures login. Some of them have commented on AMP Futures review platforms. In this article, we have shared some reviews that you can look at. Read on!

FXGlory Review: Vanishing Profits, Capital Scams & Withdrawal Charges Keep Annoying Traders
Does FXGlory remove all your forex trading account balances upon fund withdrawal requests? Or do you witness incorrect trading account balances after fund withdrawals? Does the Saint Lucia-based forex broker charge you for fund withdrawals? All these and many more scam-related complaints have been filed against the forex broker. In this FXGlory review article, we will discuss several complaints. Read on!

PINAKINE Broker Review: A Complete Look at Its Services and Risks
Finding a trustworthy broker from the huge and often confusing world of online trading options is one of the biggest challenges a trader faces. In this competitive market, PINAKINE Liquidity Limited has appeared, getting attention with promises of high leverage and zero-commission trading. However, a closer look shows important factors that every potential client must think about before investing. The most important thing to consider with PINAKINE is that it has no regulation. This fact completely changes how risky the broker is and has major effects on how safe your investments will be. This review gives a complete and fair examination based on information available to the public. We will break down its services, trading conditions, platform technology, and the possible risks involved, helping you make a fully informed decision.

