简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
JPMorgan Chase CEO: Banking crisis is not over yet and its impact will continue for years.
Abstract:On Tuesday (April 4th), JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon stated in his annual letter to shareholders that the banking crisis triggered by the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank is far from over and will continue to impact the industry for years to come.

Dimon wrote, “As I write this letter, the current crisis is not yet over and, even when it is, it will continue to have repercussions for years to come.”
Last month, the collapses of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank sparked a banking crisis that swept across Europe and America. Switzerland's second-largest bank, Credit Suisse, also became a casualty of this crisis and was ultimately acquired by its main competitor, UBS Group.
Dimon pointed out that the banking crisis will make banks more conservative and lead to tighter credit conditions. However, he also stated that the recent banking crisis is completely different from the 2008 financial crisis, which hit large banks, mortgage lenders, and insurance companies, whereas the current crisis involves far fewer financial participants and issues to be resolved.
In the recent banking crisis, regional US banks bore the brunt of the pressure. While investors and analysts generally believe that the too-big-to-fail banks will benefit from this crisis, Dimon stated that JPMorgan hopes to strengthen the smaller banks to benefit the entire financial system.
Dimon wrote, “Any crisis that damages Americans' trust in banks damages all banks. While this banking crisis has indeed been a 'benefit' for big banks, as they have received a lot of deposits flowing in from smaller institutions, any notion that this crisis has been good for them is absurd.”
Discussion on Regulatory Reform
After the outbreak of the banking crisis, there was a strong call to strengthen banking regulation, and the Federal Reserve was criticized for not fulfilling its regulatory responsibilities adequately. The U.S. Congress is considering a series of bills, including repealing the 2018 law that relaxed regulation of neutral banks.
According to Jamie Dimon, any new regulatory requirements should be carefully considered, including clearer rules for dealing with bankrupt banks. He wrote, “The recent failures of Silicon Valley Bank and Swiss Credit, as well as related pressures on the banking system, highlight that meeting regulatory requirements alone is not enough. Risks are diverse, and managing these risks requires continuous and vigilant review as the world evolves.”
Dimon pointed out that lawmakers should find ways to boost small and medium-sized banks and make regulation more effective. It was the failure of federal regulators to prevent bank failures and the Federal Reserve's stress tests not considering rising interest rates that ultimately led to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank.
Dimon explained, “This is not to absolve bank management, but rather to point out that this is not the best time for many participants. When the market, rating agencies, and depositors are paying attention to them, all these conflicting factors become critical.”
Discussing Artificial Intelligence
In the letter, Dimon also mentioned the recent hot topic in the market - the rise of artificial intelligence (AI). While JPMorgan Chase has already started using AI, Dimon emphasized the importance of using this technology with caution.
Dimon wrote, “We take very seriously the responsible use of AI, and have a cross-disciplinary team of ethicists to help us prevent unintended uses, anticipate regulation, and promote trust with our clients, customers, and communities.”
WikiFX's commitment to providing traders with comprehensive information and resources to help them succeed in the forex market. Access our comprehensive broker database, client feedback system, and regulatory information on the go. Download the WikiFX app today and make informed trading decisions anytime, anywhere.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Voices of the Golden Insight Award Jury | Kazuaki Takabatake, CCO of Titan FX
WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr
