简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
2 Million Profit in Exchange for Decades in Prison
Abstract:Three were accused of manipulating the price of HYDRO for $2 million profit. If found guilty, each defendant could receive a maximum sentence of five years in jail for conspiring to manipulate the price of securities and twenty years for each additional offence.

Three people—two Americans and one South African—were accused of planning to manipulate the price of HYDRO, a virtual asset produced by the Hydrogen Technology Corporation.
Hydro (HYDRO) is an ERC-20 token that runs on the Ethereum blockchain platform. It is used as a means of payment and governance within the Hydro ecosystem.
The Hydro protocol provides several financial services, including decentralised identity management, authentication, and access control. These services enable developers to build decentralised applications that are secure, transparent, and accessible to anyone.
Hydro token holders can use their tokens to access these services and participate in the governance of the Hydro ecosystem. They can also earn rewards for staking their tokens or participating in community initiatives.
According to court documents, Michael Kane, Shane Hampton, and George Wolvaardt allegedly planned to defraud market participants by fabricating the appearance of supply and demand for HYDRO to persuade other market participants to trade at prices, quantities, and times that they otherwise would not have traded.
Shane Hampton was Hydrogen Technology's Chief of Financial Engineering, and Michael Kane was the company's co-founder and CEO. George Wolvaardt was the company's, Chief Technology Officer. Kane and Hampton employed Moonwalkers Trading Limited, a self-described “market-making” company, to create the trading bot and manipulate the market for HYDRO.
The defendants are accused of using a trading bot to place thousands of orders that they had no intention of carrying out, or “spoof orders,” as well as thousands of orders where the bot made purchases and sales of tokens to itself using the same account, or “wash trades.” By selling HYDRO at inflated prices, the conspirators allegedly made $2 million in profit.
One count of conspiracy to commit securities price manipulation, one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and two charges of wire fraud are each brought against Michael Kane, Shane Hampton, and George Wolvaardt. If found guilty, each defendant could receive a maximum sentence of five years in jail for conspiring to manipulate the price of securities and twenty years for each additional offence.
Additionally penalised for their involvement in the plan were Tyler Ostern, the former CEO of Moonwalkers, and Andrew Chorlian, a blockchain engineer at Hydrogen Technology. Ostern and Chorlian are accused of conspiring to commit securities price manipulation and wire fraud on one count. They each might get a maximum sentence of five years in prison if found guilty.
The Securities Exchange Commission filed a complaint in September 2022 against the Hydrogen Technology Corporation, CEO Michael Ross Kane, and Moonwalkers CEO Tyler Ostern for the alleged price manipulation of the company's proprietary token, HYDRO. Following the conclusion of the civil case, the Securities Exchange Commission filed criminal charges in Miami, Florida.
Although Tyler Ostern, the CEO of Moonwalkers Ltd., was also accused in the case, he promptly agreed to pay $41,000 to resolve the matter. The courts finally decided the destiny of Hydrogen Corp. and its CEO on April 20th.
Kane was permanently barred from business transactions using cryptocurrencies by the court's order forbidding him from participating in any future digital asset offerings. He may, however, continue to use his personal account(s) to purchase, trade, and invest in cryptocurrencies. Additionally, the defendant was mandated to destroy or otherwise withdraw from the market all HYDRO tokens held in his individual accounts and those that belong to his business.
In addition, Michael Kane and Hydrogen Technology have one year to pay over $2.6 million in fines and disgorgement fees—the latter of which is the legal phrase for restoring gains that were made illegally. The company currently owes the SEC over $1.5 million in disgorgement, over $244k in prejudgment interest, and over $1 million in civil penalties. For his coordination role in the fraud, Michael Ross Kane was also mandated to pay a separate civil penalty of nearly $260,000.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!
