简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
ASIC sues Money3 Loans for responsible lending breaches
Abstract:The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has taken legal action in the Federal Court against car finance provider Money3 Loans Pty Ltd (Money3), accusing the company of violating responsible lending obligations in relation to the financing of second-hand vehicle purchases.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has taken legal action in the Federal Court against car finance provider Money3 Loans Pty Ltd (Money3), accusing the company of violating responsible lending obligations in relation to the financing of second-hand vehicle purchases.
According to ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court, the regulatory body is determined to take decisive measures against credit providers who fail to consider the financial circumstances of vulnerable consumers. She emphasized that holding such entities accountable is a top priority for ASIC.
The allegations against Money3 span the period from May 2019 to February 2021, during which the company allegedly neglected to adequately assess whether certain borrowers, including First Nations peoples, possessed the means to meet their repayment obligations before entering into loan contracts for the acquisition of used vehicles. It is worth noting that a significant portion of Money3's customer base consisted of individuals reliant solely on Centrelink payments or with low incomes.
ASIC's concern lies in the inadequate evaluation of these loans to determine whether borrowers could manage repayments without experiencing financial distress. The loans primarily targeted individuals with limited incomes, exacerbating their financial hardships.
Court added, “The consumer loans we are concerned with showed the purchase price of $8,000 for a second-hand vehicle, with additional fees and warranty costs amounting to another $3,000. An $11,000 loan is a substantial sum for a consumer on a low income to repay without having been properly assessed as to whether they could afford to repay it. In some cases, the vehicle broke down, leaving the consumer with an unusable car and an unaffordable loan, compounding the detriment.”
ASIC's specific allegations against Money3 include:
Entered into unsuitable loans with certain consumers, meaning the consumer could not meet their repayments without experiencing financial hardship;
Failed to assess those loans as unsuitable by determining that the consumers could not meet the repayments without experiencing financial hardship;
Failed to make reasonable inquiries about, and verify, those consumers financial situation, requirements, and objectives;
Failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that its representatives complied with the credit legislation and were adequately trained and competent.
Furthermore, ASIC asserts that Money3 applied arbitrary expense figures from an internal “product guide” when approving loans. These figures were not based on the borrowers' actual financial situations and were substantially lower than their reasonable and necessary expenses.
The case will proceed in the Federal Court, and a hearing date will be determined by the Court in due course.
About Money3
Money3 Loans Pty Ltd (Money3) is a car finance provider based in Australia. The company offers loans specifically for the purchase of second-hand vehicles. Money3 operates in the consumer lending sector, providing financial assistance to individuals seeking to acquire cars. However, it has recently come under scrutiny for alleged breaches of responsible lending obligations, whereby it is accused of failing to adequately assess borrowers' ability to repay loans, particularly those who rely on Centrelink payments or have low incomes.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Charles Schwab Review: Traders Claim Illegitimate Profit Cancellation, Trade Manipulation & More
Have you been lured into the Charles Schwab app for trading on the back of outrageous profit claims by the broker? Did you fail to receive any of these? Does the broker deny withdrawals every time you request and cancel your forex trading account? Have you been victimized financially by its trade manipulation? Act before you are left with a NIL balance in your account. Many traders have questioned Charles Schwab customer service and many other operational executives for the aforementioned illegitimate trading activities. In this Charles Schwab review article, we have shared some of their comments. Read on!

AMP Futures Exposed: Traders Raise Alarms Over Illegitimate Account Blocks & Bad Customer Service
Has AMP Futures blocked your forex trading account? Does it fail to provide any explanation for this act? Do you face issues concerning deposits to your AMP Futures account? Is the customer service non-existent for any trading query you raise with it? You are not alone! Many traders have been facing these issues upon AMP Futures login. Some of them have commented on AMP Futures review platforms. In this article, we have shared some reviews that you can look at. Read on!

FXGlory Review: Vanishing Profits, Capital Scams & Withdrawal Charges Keep Annoying Traders
Does FXGlory remove all your forex trading account balances upon fund withdrawal requests? Or do you witness incorrect trading account balances after fund withdrawals? Does the Saint Lucia-based forex broker charge you for fund withdrawals? All these and many more scam-related complaints have been filed against the forex broker. In this FXGlory review article, we will discuss several complaints. Read on!

PINAKINE Broker Review: A Complete Look at Its Services and Risks
Finding a trustworthy broker from the huge and often confusing world of online trading options is one of the biggest challenges a trader faces. In this competitive market, PINAKINE Liquidity Limited has appeared, getting attention with promises of high leverage and zero-commission trading. However, a closer look shows important factors that every potential client must think about before investing. The most important thing to consider with PINAKINE is that it has no regulation. This fact completely changes how risky the broker is and has major effects on how safe your investments will be. This review gives a complete and fair examination based on information available to the public. We will break down its services, trading conditions, platform technology, and the possible risks involved, helping you make a fully informed decision.

