Aha Group $35 Million Crypto Fraud Draws Harsh Jail Terms in South Korea
Senior executives of the Aha Group have been handed lengthy prison sentences for orchestrating a crypto fraud of $35 million.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Multichain has experienced a downtime exceeding 30 hours following a security breach, during which $67.5 million worth of stolen assets have been frozen, and $1.85 million worth of tokens have been permanently removed from circulation.

Circle and Tether have taken action against five addresses that were found to contain stolen assets worth $67.5 million from the Multichain hack on July 7. Circle, the issuer of USD Coin (USDC), froze three accounts holding $65 million in stolen assets, including 63 million USDC, as reported by PeckShield. Additionally, Tether, the issuer of the USDT stablecoin, froze two accounts holding 2.53 million USDT, as announced by the Fantom Foundation.
In response to the hack, Daniele Sestagalli from the ICE crypto project stated that the protocol would burn the $1.85 million worth of ICE tokens that were stolen from Multichain. To compensate affected users, Fantom Multichain plans to distribute WAGMI tokens through an airdrop, replacing the burned ICE tokens.
Although measures have been taken to blacklist and burn the stolen tokens, it is important to note that the exploiter may still have access to the remaining stolen assets, which are valued at over $56 million.
Massive breach
Multichain experienced a significant security breach on July 7, which led to the suspension of its operations. The breach involved the abnormal transfer of assets from the locked MPC smart contract on the protocol.
In order to transfer assets from one blockchain to another, users must lock up their assets on the Multichain bridge's MPC smart contract. Once locked, a wrapped version of the asset is created on the target blockchain. The exploiters targeted and stole these locked-up assets intended for transfer to other chains.
According to Web3 Knowledge Graph Protocol 0xScope, the exploit impacted several blockchains, including Fantom, Dogechain, Moonriver, and Conflux.
The Multichain team has acknowledged the incident but has limited details at this time. They are actively investigating the breach. PeckShield estimates the value of the stolen assets in the exploit to be approximately $126 million.
As of now, Multichain operations have been suspended for more than 30 hours, and there is no confirmed timeframe for when operations will resume.


Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Senior executives of the Aha Group have been handed lengthy prison sentences for orchestrating a crypto fraud of $35 million.

Are you struggling to receive withdrawals from Ester, a Saint Lucia-based forex broker? Did you face trade manipulation on various aspects, including copytrading? Did this manipulation lead to massive capital losses? You are not alone! Several traders have accused the broker of trading misconduct. In this Ester review article, we have examined their allegations. Have a look!

GODO, a Mauritius-based forex broker, is gaining attention from users worldwide for the various products and services it offers to them. According to the broker’s official website, it attributes the decision and success to making trading go beyond a service to becoming an exceptional experience for clients. So, if you are already its customer or are planning to become one, here is the comprehensive GODO review you must read. The review will take you through different account types, trading conditions and user reports.

TRADE.COM, a Mauritius-based forex broker, is gaining attention on broker review platforms, such as WikiFX, for more negative reasons than positive ones. The negative reports have emerged on account of the constant withdrawal denials and capital losses due to the alleged wrong trading guidance by the broker. There are positive reviews too, but most of them sound too generic. Exposure reports cover specific glitches traders have faced here. In this TRADE.COM review article, we have investigated multiple complaints against the forex broker. Read on!