World Cup Fever Is Here! Choose your broker like you choose your team
Join WikiFX and investors worldwide in celebrating the excitement of the 2026 FIFA World Cup!
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:Bastion Capital London Limited (in liquidation) has been fined £2,452,700 by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) due to serious financial crime control failures related to cum-ex trading. The company neglected to effectively manage the risk of being involved in fraudulent trading and money laundering activities.

Bastion Capital London Limited (in liquidation) has been fined £2,452,700 by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) due to serious financial crime control failures related to cum-ex trading. The company neglected to effectively manage the risk of being involved in fraudulent trading and money laundering activities.
During the period between January 2014 and September 2015, Bastion executed trades amounting to approximately £49 billion in Danish equities and £22.5 billion in Belgian equities on behalf of clients from the Solo Group. These trades were conducted in a manner that strongly indicated involvement in financial crime. It appears that the purpose of these trades was to facilitate withholding tax reclaims in Denmark and Belgium. Bastion received a commission of £1.55 million, a significant portion of the firm's revenue during that period.
Moreover, Bastion carried out a series of trades on behalf of 11 Solo Clients within a four-day period. These clients then executed opposite positions shortly after, but at significantly different prices. As a result, one Solo client, Ganymede Cayman Ltd (an entity fully owned by the Solo Group's controller), incurred a loss of €22.7 million, while the remaining 10 Solo Clients benefited from this arrangement.
Bastion either ignored or failed to notice several warning signs associated with these trades, which lacked any apparent economic purpose except for transferring funds from the Solo Group's controller to business associates. Bastion should have assessed the financial crime risks when onboarding these Solo Clients and when executing the trades.
Steve Smart, Joint Executive Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight, stated, “Bastion earned substantial fees by executing trades on behalf of the Solo Group that ultimately aimed to make illegitimate tax reclaims from the Danish and Belgian authorities. They failed to identify clear indicators that should have alerted them to the risk of involvement in financial crime. It is crucial for firms to effectively manage these risks.”
This case marks the fifth instance where the FCA has taken action regarding cum-ex trading and forms part of the FCA's broader efforts to address cum-ex dividend arbitrage cases and withholding tax (WHT) schemes. The FCA has actively collaborated with global law enforcement authorities in this regard. The fines imposed by the FCA on firms involved in this trading have surpassed £20 million, considering that these firms earned over £7 million in fees.
As Bastion did not dispute the FCA's findings and agreed to settle, it qualified for a 30% discount under the FCA's Settlement Discount Scheme.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Join WikiFX and investors worldwide in celebrating the excitement of the 2026 FIFA World Cup!

Some broker comparisons end with a confident "go with this one." This is not one of them — and that honesty is exactly what makes it worth reading. Wundersys and tradgrip are two young, offshore-registered brokers that keep popping up in front of beginner traders, often through aggressive online marketing. Both promise the usual buffet: tight spreads, generous leverage, multiple account tiers. And both, according to WikiFX, sit near the very bottom of the safety scale. So instead of crowning a champion, this comparison is really about something more useful: learning to read the warning signs, understanding the small differences that still matter, and knowing why "the better of two risky options" is still a conversation about risk.

If you trade forex from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, or Nepal, you already know the quiet truth that eats into every trader's results: it is not just the market that decides whether you profit — it is the cost of getting in and out of each trade. Shave a couple of dollars off your commission on every lot, multiply it across hundreds of trades a year, and you are looking at the difference between a strategy that works and one that bleeds out slowly. South Asian traders are some of the most cost-conscious in the world, and rightly so. So we pulled the data on the brokers most often recommended for the region, cross-checked every name on WikiFX, and ranked them by the one number that matters most here: what they actually charge you to trade. Before the list, one quick lesson that will make this whole ranking click.

If you have spent even a week inside trading communities lately, you already know the pitch by heart. Pass a quick "challenge," get handed a funded account worth tens of thousands of dollars, and keep up to 80% of everything you make. No risking your own savings, no slow grind of building capital from scratch — just skill, a small fee, and a fast track to the big leagues. It is the exact dream every new trader is secretly chasing, and an entire industry has sprung up to sell it. XPO Fund is one of the louder voices selling that story right now. Its website is slick, its plans sound generous, and its marketing leans hard on words like "industry's lowest fee" and "fast payouts." But before you reach for your card, there is one number sitting quietly on this firm's profile — a number it would rather you scroll past — that every experienced trader would beg you to look at first. And no, it is not the profit split. Let's pull XPO Fund apart piece by piece: what it actually is, who is real