Smart People, Costly Scams: Education Isn’t Enough
Sundramoorthy said investment scams continued to ensnare victims from all walks of life, including highly educated professionals accustomed to analytical and evidence-based thinking
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Amidst escalating legal tensions, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission intensifies its pursuit of Binance.US, pushing for access to scrutinize the exchange's asset custody services, while Binance.US defends itself against allegations of evasive responses and dwindling trading volumes.

The legal battle between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Binance.US has taken an intensified turn, with the SEC urging a D.C. court to grant access to scrutinize the exchange's asset custody services. This move by the SEC reflects its determination to address what it views as Binance.US's evasive responses to document requests.
The latest development centres on a protective order Binance.US sought in June, designed to counter what the exchange has characterized as the SEC's “fishing expedition.” This matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui by Federal Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
The SEC initiated legal action against Binance.US in June, filing a lawsuit targeting Binance.US, its global parent company, Binance Holdings, and its founder, Changpeng “CZ” Zhao. The primary allegation was that they operated an unlicensed securities exchange, raising concerns about investor protection and regulatory compliance. Given the progress in the case thus far, the SEC has presented a compelling case for the necessity of a thorough inspection of Binance.US.
A central point of contention in this legal dispute surrounds Binance's custody platform, formerly known as Binance Custody but rebranded as Ceffu earlier this year. The SEC has expressed suspicions that Ceffu may also be serving Binance.US, potentially enabling the transfer of U.S. customer funds abroad.

The filing from the SEC states, “The SEC seeks an order compelling BAM to produce documents and communications concerning any entity providing it wallet custody software and related services.” This reflects the SEC's frustration with what it perceives as evasive responses and shifting narratives from BAM.
Despite the SEC's allegations, Binance.US has mounted a vigorous defence. On September 12, the exchange's legal team submitted sealed documents in response to the SEC's motion to compel, characterizing many of the regulator's demands as “unreasonable” and “excessively burdensome.”
Meanwhile, data from Amberdata on The Tie Terminal has revealed a substantial decline in trading volume on Binance.US. The volume plummeted to a mere $5.09 million, starkly contrasting the approximately $230 million recorded on September 17, 2022. The exchange reached its lowest point on September 9 when trading activity dipped to just $2.97 million.
Additionally, Binance.US is grappling with a wave of high-level departures, with its Head of Legal, Krishna Juvvadi, and Chief Risk Officer, Sidney Majalya, recently stepping down from their positions. This leadership shake-up closely follows the departure of CEO Brian Shroder earlier this month, all against the backdrop of heightened regulatory scrutiny surrounding the exchange.
In June, Finance Magnates reported the commencement of negotiations between Binance.US and the SEC to prevent a comprehensive freeze of the exchange's assets. These negotiations sought to strike a balance between safeguarding investor funds and allowing the exchange to continue its operations under regulatory oversight.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Sundramoorthy said investment scams continued to ensnare victims from all walks of life, including highly educated professionals accustomed to analytical and evidence-based thinking

Police busted 97 online scam cases and seized more than RM5 million, in a series of integrated operations conducted in the capital throughout last year.

When traders ask, "Is OneRoyal legit or a scam?" The answer isn't simply yes or no. OneRoyal is a trading company that has been running for almost twenty years and has important licenses from top financial authorities. This background puts it far away from typical quick scam operations. However, questions about whether it's trustworthy are reasonable and often come from its complicated business structure, the use of overseas companies, and a pattern of specific, serious complaints from users. This article aims to go beyond marketing claims and provide a fact-based analysis of OneRoyal's trustworthiness.

A global crypto transparency era begins as 48 countries enforce CARF rules; data-sharing to combat tax evasion expands worldwide by 2029.