Retiree loses over RM337,000 in Facebook investment scam
Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The SEC charged Matthew Melton with fraud, alleging he misled investors about his algorithmic trading scheme, collecting over $3.4 million. Melton claimed his algorithm could generate 12% monthly returns but was unprofitable, misusing over $1.5 million for personal expenses and Ponzi-like payments.

In a significant move to safeguard investor interests, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently brought charges against Matthew Melton for defrauding investors through misleading representations related to his algorithmic trading scheme. This decisive action by the SEC underlines its commitment to uphold the integrity of financial markets and protect investors from deceptive practices.
The case centers around Melton's algorithmic trading approach, specifically his Price Physics trading algorithm. From April 1, 2018, to October 31, 2020, Melton allegedly collected over $3.4 million from at least 23 investors, primarily based in Puerto Rico and sharing a common interest in outdoor activities. Melton's claim that his algorithm could generate consistent monthly returns of 12% was central to attracting these investments. However, contrary to his assertions, the SEC's complaint reveals that Melton's trading activities were consistently unprofitable.
Further complicating the issue, Melton is accused of misappropriating over $1.5 million of the invested funds. Instead of employing the funds as intended for algorithmic trading, he allegedly used them for personal expenses, including travel, sailing, and mortgage payments. This misuse of funds also involved Ponzi-like payments to other investors, a severe breach of trust and financial ethics.
The SEC's complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, charges Melton with violations of federal securities laws. The Commission seeks extensive relief measures, including permanent injunctive relief, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, civil penalties, and an officer-and-director bar against Melton. This comprehensive legal action underscores the SEC's dedication to enforcing securities laws and ensuring fair play in the investment arena.

In a parallel development, the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York has announced criminal charges against Melton, highlighting the severity of the alleged misconduct.
The Securities and Exchange Commission, as a federal agency, plays a pivotal role in regulating and overseeing the securities industry. Its mission is to protect investors, maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitate capital formation. The SEC's actions against fraudulent activities, like the case against Melton, are vital in maintaining investor confidence and the integrity of financial markets.
The SEC's action in the Melton case is a clear message to the investment community about the seriousness with which it approaches its mandate of investor protection. This case serves as a reminder of the risks involved in algorithmic trading and the importance of due diligence by investors. The SEC remains vigilant in its pursuit of those who seek to undermine the financial system through fraudulent activities.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment

Failed to withdraw funds from the BDSWISS trading account despite multiple attempts? Did the broker reject your fund withdrawal application without any reason? Did the high slippage lead to massive capital losses? Was the customer support team far from ideal? Many traders have reported these issues online. In this BDSWISS review article, we have examined several such complaints against the forex broker.

When your capital is at risk, trust isn't just a feeling - it's something you can measure. For traders thinking about using the broker Evest, one question is impossible to avoid: Is Evest a trusted partner for your investments, or does it put your investments at serious risk? The answer to this important question, "Is Evest Safe or Scam?", isn't found in the company's ads. You find it by comparing what the broker officially says with the real, often worrying experiences of actual users. This review won't rely on guessing. Instead, we'll take a deep look at the broker's legal status and, more importantly, the number and types of real Evest complaints. Our research is based on public information, mainly from the worldwide broker research platform, WikiFX, to show the truth about Evest's reputation.

XPO Markets, a Comoros-based brokerage entity, is in the news for negative reasons. These include the alleged INR 3,100 crore fund scam complaint filed by 3 lakh Indians in November 2025. Such a scam puts a serious question mark on the authenticity of this forex broker. In this XPO Markets review article, we have highlighted the million-dollar scam along with the risk parameters associated with this broker.