简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
FINRA Slaps $24M Fine on BofA Securities
Abstract:FINRA levies $24 million fine against BofA Securities for alleged spoofing and supervisory failures, unveiling ongoing regulatory scrutiny across financial markets.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has taken action against BofA Securities, imposing a significant fine of $24 million. This penalty comes as a result of the firm's alleged involvement in more than 700 instances of spoofing and associated supervisory shortcomings within the US Treasury secondary markets, spanning over a six-year period.
Spoofing, a practice involving deceptive orders to fabricate market activity, was reportedly employed by BofA Securities through two former traders in the US Treasury secondary markets from October 2014 to February 2021. The firm stands accused of engaging in 717 instances of spoofing during this time.
The Executive Vice President and Head of Enforcement at FINRA, Bill St. Louis, expressed concern, highlighting that spoofing undermines market transparency and integrity by distorting actual supply and demand. He emphasized that this action underscores FINRA's commitment to vigorously pursue firms involved in spoofing, including cross-product spoofing.
Throughout this duration, BofA Securities failed to establish and sustain a supervisory system capable of detecting spoofing activities in the US Treasury markets. Although a system was implemented by the company in November 2015, it remained inadequate until mid-2019, primarily detecting algorithmic spoofing and not manual manipulation by traders.

While BofA Securities has accepted FINRA's findings without admitting or denying the charges, it's worth noting that the company was previously fined $325,000 last year by FINRA for allegedly issuing inaccurate monthly reports for order execution.
The regulatory body disclosed that between January 2014 and February 2022, BofA Securities incorrectly reported order execution statistics for its two market centres, MLCO and MLIX. The company reportedly disregarded the requirement to present separate statistical information under Rule 605, leading to combined reports for both centres being published.
In a separate incident, Credit Suisse faced scrutiny when FINRA fined its US subsidiary $900,000 for deficiencies in regulatory reporting. The violations involved tardy trades and inaccurate reports from November 2015 to March 2023 on the Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine.
Earlier this year, Webull was subject to a $3 million penalty by FINRA. The focus was on the firm's oversight in onboarding options traders and the absence of adequate supervisory systems to identify and address customer complaints. This oversight led to the approval of roughly 9,000 unqualified traders, including more than 2,500 customers under 21 without the required options trading experience.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

How to Become a Profitable Forex Trader in Pakistan in 2025
If you want to enter the forex market in Pakistan and achieve success, earning consistent profits and excelling in trading, then you should check out this “How to Become a Profitable Forex Trader in Pakistan in 2025” article. You will wonder why you need to do this? The answer is simple: this article covers all the essential topics such as Forex Trading in Pakistan, and ways to learn Forex Trading in Pakistan, even if you are a native speaker and want to learn forex trading in Urdu. This article talks about that too. So, if you want to succeed in the forex market in 2025, read this article sincerely.

Alpha FX Allegations: Traders Claim Account Blocks, Withdrawal Denials and Security Breaches
Is trading with Alpha FX fraught with too many errors and scams? Have you seen your forex trading account blocked after requesting fund withdrawals with the broker? Invested a heavy amount, but finding it hard to withdraw the sum? Have you seen domain changes while attempting an Alpha FX login? These issues have become typical for Alpha FX traders, with many of them sharing their frustration online. In this Alpha FX review guide, we have shared some trading complaints against the UK-based forex broker. Read on!

CFTC Polymarket Approval Signals U.S. Relaunch 2025
CFTC Polymarket approval clears path for Polymarket U.S. relaunch 2025, reshaping regulated prediction markets in the United States.

In-Depth Review of MH Markets Trading Conditions and Leverage – An Analysis for Experienced Traders
For experienced traders, selecting a broker is a meticulous process that extends far beyond marketing claims and bonus offers. It involves a granular analysis of the core trading environment: the quality of execution, the flexibility of leverage, the integrity of the regulatory framework, and the suitability of the conditions for one's specific strategy. MH Markets, a broker with a 5-10 year operational history, presents a complex and multifaceted profile that warrants such a detailed examination. This in-depth review dissects the MH Markets trading conditions and leverage, using primary data from the global broker inquiry app, WikiFX, to provide a clear, data-driven perspective. We will analyze the broker's execution environment, account structures, and regulatory standing to determine which types of traders might find its offering compelling and what critical risks they must consider.

