简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
UK FCA Fines CBPL £3.5M for High-Risk Customer Violations
Abstract:The UK FCA has fined CBPL £3.5M for onboarding high-risk customers, violating regulatory requirements, and weak financial crime controls.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) fined CB Payments Limited (CBPL), a member of the Coinbase Group, £3,503,546 for failing to comply with regulatory standards. The good outcomes of CBPL's inability to follow guidelines prevented it from providing services to high-risk clients.
CBPL provides a worldwide crypto asset trading platform but does not directly handle crypto-asset transactions. Instead, it allows customers to access these transactions via other Coinbase Group firms. CBPL needs to be registered in the United Kingdom to conduct crypto-asset transactions.
CBPL Exceeds High-Risk Levels
Following negotiations with the FCA, CBPL agreed on a voluntary requirement (VREQ) in October 2020. This criterion was motivated by worries regarding the efficiency of CBPL's financial crime control structure. The VREQ expressly forbade CBPL from onboarding new high-risk clients until its control mechanisms could be improved.
Despite this prohibition, CBPL accepted and served 13,416 high-risk clients with e-money services. Approximately 31 per cent of these consumers made deposits totalling USD 24.9 million. These monies were then utilized for withdrawals and crypto asset transactions via other Coinbase Group firms, totalling about USD 226 million.

CBPL violated the VREQ by failing to develop, test, implement, or monitor appropriate controls, resulting in the first FCA fine under regulations. The company should have considered all possible onboarding techniques and effectively monitored compliance. As a result, several severe breaches went unnoticed for almost two years.
Therese Chambers, the FCA's Joint Executive Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight, underscored the seriousness of the situation: The money laundering concerns linked with cryptocurrency are evident, and enterprises must take them seriously. Firms that support crypto trading, such as CBPL, must have rigorous financial crime controls.
Chambers said, “CBPL's controls had major flaws, which is why the restrictions were enforced. CBPL, on the other hand, consistently violated these rules. This enhanced the likelihood that criminals would utilize CBPL to launder their money. We will not allow such leniency, which endangers the integrity of our markets.”
Conclusion
This is the FCA's first enforcement action under the 2011 Electronic Money Regulations. CBPL agreed to remedy the situation, which resulted in a 30% reduction in the punishment. The FCA's decisive action emphasizes the significance of financial solid crime controls in the fast-changing crypto asset business.
For trending news, access the daily news on the financial market here.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

CySEC warns against 10 unauthorized investment firms
The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) has issued a public warning against 10 unauthorized investment firms that are illegally offering investment services to investors.

Voices of the Golden Insight Award Jury | Nattachai Chalermwat, MH Markets
WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

Apex Markets Review: Traders Outraged Over Withdrawal Denials & Other Trading Issues
Struggling to access fund withdrawals from Apex Markets for months? Does the broker remain silent on fund withdrawal issues? Does the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker reject your winning trades? Have you failed to get a refund into the card used for deposits? Did the broker deduct from your trading account instead? Traders have been imposing these scam allegations while sharing the Apex Markets Review online. We read the reviews and shared some of them below. Take a look!

tastyfx Exposed: Fund Losses, Trade Manipulation & Account Related Hassles Hurt Traders
Are fund losses normal for you at tastyfx? Does the US-based forex broker constantly manipulate prices to hit your trading experience? Do you fail to receive a reply from the broker on your fund withdrawal requests? Do you constantly face trading account issues with tastyfx? It’s time to read the tastyfx review shared by traders online.

