WikiFX Valentine's Message | Trade Safely, Together Every Step of the Way
In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The UK FCA has fined CBPL £3.5M for onboarding high-risk customers, violating regulatory requirements, and weak financial crime controls.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) fined CB Payments Limited (CBPL), a member of the Coinbase Group, £3,503,546 for failing to comply with regulatory standards. The good outcomes of CBPL's inability to follow guidelines prevented it from providing services to high-risk clients.
CBPL provides a worldwide crypto asset trading platform but does not directly handle crypto-asset transactions. Instead, it allows customers to access these transactions via other Coinbase Group firms. CBPL needs to be registered in the United Kingdom to conduct crypto-asset transactions.
Following negotiations with the FCA, CBPL agreed on a voluntary requirement (VREQ) in October 2020. This criterion was motivated by worries regarding the efficiency of CBPL's financial crime control structure. The VREQ expressly forbade CBPL from onboarding new high-risk clients until its control mechanisms could be improved.
Despite this prohibition, CBPL accepted and served 13,416 high-risk clients with e-money services. Approximately 31 per cent of these consumers made deposits totalling USD 24.9 million. These monies were then utilized for withdrawals and crypto asset transactions via other Coinbase Group firms, totalling about USD 226 million.

CBPL violated the VREQ by failing to develop, test, implement, or monitor appropriate controls, resulting in the first FCA fine under regulations. The company should have considered all possible onboarding techniques and effectively monitored compliance. As a result, several severe breaches went unnoticed for almost two years.
Therese Chambers, the FCA's Joint Executive Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight, underscored the seriousness of the situation: The money laundering concerns linked with cryptocurrency are evident, and enterprises must take them seriously. Firms that support crypto trading, such as CBPL, must have rigorous financial crime controls.
Chambers said, “CBPL's controls had major flaws, which is why the restrictions were enforced. CBPL, on the other hand, consistently violated these rules. This enhanced the likelihood that criminals would utilize CBPL to launder their money. We will not allow such leniency, which endangers the integrity of our markets.”
Conclusion
This is the FCA's first enforcement action under the 2011 Electronic Money Regulations. CBPL agreed to remedy the situation, which resulted in a 30% reduction in the punishment. The FCA's decisive action emphasizes the significance of financial solid crime controls in the fast-changing crypto asset business.
For trending news, access the daily news on the financial market here.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support

Did you face losses due to a sudden change in the trading price on the datian platform? Were your transaction records deleted by the Hong Kong-based forex broker? Did the broker liquidate your trading account multiple times despite not reaching the stage where it mandated this move? Have you experienced heavy slippage on the trading platform? Concerned by these issues, traders have complained about the broker online. We will let you know of these with attached screenshots in this datian review article. Keep reading!

Did you face constant rejections of your fund withdrawal applications by TopstepFX? Have you been denied withdrawals in the name of hedging? Did you witness an account block without any clear explanation from the forex broker? There have been numerous user claims against TopstepFX regarding its withdrawals, payout delays and other issues. In the TopstepFX review article, we have investigated the top complaints against the US-based forex broker. Keep reading!

When choosing a broker, the first question is always about safety and legitimacy. Is my capital safe? For Mazi Finance, the answer is clear and worrying: Mazi Finance is an unregulated broker. While the company, MaziMatic Financial Services LTD, is registered in the offshore location of Saint Lucia, this business registration does not replace strong financial regulation from a top-level authority. Independent analysis from regulatory watchdogs shows a very low trust score, made worse by official warnings from government financial bodies and many user complaints about serious problems. This article provides a clear, fact-based analysis of the Mazi Finance regulation status. Our goal is to break down the facts and present the risks clearly, helping you make an informed decision and protect your capital.