WikiFX Valentine's Message | Trade Safely, Together Every Step of the Way
In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Brex Treasury LLC has reached a settlement with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to resolve allegations related to its anti-money laundering (AML) compliance practices. As part of the settlement, Brex Treasury has agreed to pay a fine of $900,000 and accept a censure.

Brex Treasury LLC has reached a settlement with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to resolve allegations related to its anti-money laundering (AML) compliance practices. As part of the settlement, Brex Treasury has agreed to pay a fine of $900,000 and accept a censure.
The settlement stems from Brex Treasurys use of an automated identity-verification algorithm that failed to meet AML requirements. The algorithm, which was intended to verify the identities of beneficial owners and customers, had several critical shortcomings.
Algorithm Design Flaws
Initially, Brex Treasurys identity-verification system relied on a limited set of customer information—names and phone numbers—to match identities with those in third-party databases. This approach proved inadequate, as it did not collect all the necessary identifying details, such as dates of birth, addresses, or identification numbers, required under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) regulations.
In January 2021, the firm began collecting more comprehensive data, including names, dates of birth, addresses, and identification numbers. Despite this, the system still fell short. The algorithm was designed to approve accounts based on matches in vendor databases, but it did not adequately address discrepancies in the date of birth or address, which could signal potential identity fraud.
Fraud Check Limitations
Brex Treasurys automated fraud checks, which included an external fraud score from a third-party vendor, were also insufficiently rigorous. The fraud score, intended to assess the risk of identity fraud, was not always accompanied by thorough manual reviews of discrepancies flagged during fraud checks. As a result, the firm approved accounts that had significant red flags.
Inadequate Manual Reviews
The firms manual customer screening process was equally flawed. From 2020 to 2021, Brex Treasury approved hundreds of potentially fraudulent accounts. These accounts attempted transactions exceeding $15 million using funds that failed to settle. Many deposits were recalled or rejected due to issues such as insufficient funds, leaving the firm unable to recover the funds or verify customer identities.
Regulatory Violations
The failures in Brex Treasury‘s AML practices led to violations of FINRA Rules 3310(b) and 2010. These rules mandate that firms maintain adequate policies and procedures for AML compliance. The firm’s inability to effectively vet customer identities and prevent fraudulent transactions highlighted significant gaps in its compliance framework.
Settlement Details
In addition to the $900,000 fine, Brex Treasury has agreed to a censure as part of the settlement with FINRA. The censure and financial penalty underscore the importance of robust AML practices and the need for firms to ensure that their identity verification systems are designed to meet regulatory standards.
This settlement serves as a reminder for financial institutions to continuously evaluate and improve their compliance mechanisms to prevent similar lapses and protect against financial crime.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support

Did you face losses due to a sudden change in the trading price on the datian platform? Were your transaction records deleted by the Hong Kong-based forex broker? Did the broker liquidate your trading account multiple times despite not reaching the stage where it mandated this move? Have you experienced heavy slippage on the trading platform? Concerned by these issues, traders have complained about the broker online. We will let you know of these with attached screenshots in this datian review article. Keep reading!

Did you face constant rejections of your fund withdrawal applications by TopstepFX? Have you been denied withdrawals in the name of hedging? Did you witness an account block without any clear explanation from the forex broker? There have been numerous user claims against TopstepFX regarding its withdrawals, payout delays and other issues. In the TopstepFX review article, we have investigated the top complaints against the US-based forex broker. Keep reading!

When choosing a broker, the first question is always about safety and legitimacy. Is my capital safe? For Mazi Finance, the answer is clear and worrying: Mazi Finance is an unregulated broker. While the company, MaziMatic Financial Services LTD, is registered in the offshore location of Saint Lucia, this business registration does not replace strong financial regulation from a top-level authority. Independent analysis from regulatory watchdogs shows a very low trust score, made worse by official warnings from government financial bodies and many user complaints about serious problems. This article provides a clear, fact-based analysis of the Mazi Finance regulation status. Our goal is to break down the facts and present the risks clearly, helping you make an informed decision and protect your capital.