简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Former Director of Courtenay House Sentenced to 11 Years for $180 Million Ponzi Scheme
Abstract:Tony Iervasi, the former director of Courtenay House, has been sentenced to 11 years in prison by the Supreme Court of New South Wales for his role in orchestrating a $180 million Ponzi scheme.

Tony Iervasi, the former director of Courtenay House, has been sentenced to 11 years in prison by the Supreme Court of New South Wales for his role in orchestrating a $180 million Ponzi scheme. Iervasi will serve a non-parole period of seven years following his conviction for criminal charges related to the scam, which deceived hundreds of investors.
Supreme Court Justice Sweeney condemned Iervasi's actions, characterizing them as dishonest on an “egregious scale.” She noted that Iervasi had carefully constructed the facade of a successful wealth-generating business, a tactic that reassured and persuaded many victims to entrust their money to him.
Between December 13, 2010, and April 21, 2017, Iervasi served as the sole director and shareholder of Courtenay House, during which time the company raised approximately $180 million from around 585 investors. Despite the massive inflow of funds, the total net loss to investors was calculated at about $54 million. Furthermore, Iervasi personally benefited from $12 million of the misappropriated investor funds.
Courtenay House marketed itself as a company trading in Forex and futures markets, promising lucrative returns to investors. However, the reality was far different. Only about three percent of the deposited funds were ever actually traded. Instead, returns to investors were paid from the capital invested by new investors, a classic hallmark of a Ponzi scheme.

The severity of Iervasis actions was further underscored by the profound impact on the victims. Justice Sweeney detailed the extensive harm caused, noting that many investors lost their life savings and family homes. Beyond the financial devastation, the fallout included the breakdown of marriages and family relationships, as well as significant emotional, physical, and mental health issues. Many victims were forced to delay retirement or return to work due to the loss of their financial security.
In light of his guilty plea and other mitigating factors, Iervasi received a reduced sentence. Nonetheless, Justice Sweeney took into account the lengthy period of offending, the sustained deceit involved, the large number of victims, the total amount of money lost, and the significant portion of funds that Iervasi used for his own benefit.
Iervasi pleaded guilty to four offenses of engaging in dishonest conduct related to financial products or services, in violation of Section 1041G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). He also admitted guilt to charges of operating an unlicensed financial services business, contravening Section 911A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), along with two additional offenses under Section 1041G that were considered in his sentencing.
The liquidation of Courtenay House Capital Trading remains ongoing, with liquidators having distributed dividends of 28 cents on the dollar to affected investors.
In a related case, David Sipina, who was involved in investor referral and marketing for Courtenay House, pleaded guilty on March 19, 2024, to charges of operating a financial services business without a license and dealing with proceeds of crime amounting to $1 million or more. Sipina's sentencing will take place in the Sydney District Court on April 19, 2024.
Sipinas guilty plea acknowledged his role in the unlicensed business from June 24, 2015, to April 21, 2017. It was noted, however, that Sipina was not accused of knowing about the underlying Ponzi scheme, although he admitted to earning commissions from promoting investments in Courtenay House despite its unlicensed status.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Apex Markets Review: Traders Outraged Over Withdrawal Denials & Other Trading Issues
Struggling to access fund withdrawals from Apex Markets for months? Does the broker remain silent on fund withdrawal issues? Does the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker reject your winning trades? Have you failed to get a refund into the card used for deposits? Did the broker deduct from your trading account instead? Traders have been imposing these scam allegations while sharing the Apex Markets Review online. We read the reviews and shared some of them below. Take a look!

Aron Groups Review: Fund Losses, High Commission & Trade Manipulation Keep Traders on Tenterhooks
Have you lost your hard-earned capital while trading via Aron Groups Broker? Has the high commission charged by the broker substantially reduced your trading profits? Does the Marshall Islands-based forex broker constantly manipulate spreads to widen your capital losses? Have you been lured into trading courtesy of Aron Groups No Deposit Bonus, only to find that you had to deposit capital to get a bonus? All these and many more trading issues have become synonymous with the experience of Aron Groups’ traders. Consequently, many traders have shared negative Aron Groups reviews online. In this article, we have shared some of their reviews.

JP Markets Review: High Spread & Commission, Fake Bonus Lure & Withdrawal Hassles Frustrate Traders
Have you been lured into opening a JP Markets Forex Trading Account with a high bonus offer that never existed? Have you found the spread and commission charges higher on JP Markets Login than what’s advertised on the broker’s website? Wondering why you are not able to withdraw funds from your trading account? Well, all of these hint at a potential forex investment scam. Many traders have expressed their disappointment while sharing the JP Markets Review online. In this article, we have shared certain complaints. Take a look at them.

Exclusive Markets Under the Scanner: Traders Report High Swap Charges, Deposit Discrepancies & More
Is your forex trading account experience at Exclusive Markets far from good? Do you witness high swap fees and daily charges? Does the deposit fail to reflect in your Exclusive Markets Login? Don’t receive adequate response from the customer support official on your trading queries? You are not alone! Traders have already alleged that the forex broker is involved in these activities. In this Exclusive Markets WikiFX review article, we shared some traders’ comments. Read on to know about them.
