Doctor loses RM880,000 in fake share investment scam
A doctor in Pahang lost over RM880,000 in a fake share scheme promising high returns
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:A global investment training company operating under multiple brand identities has come under intense legal scrutiny after being accused of defrauding consumers of over $1 billion. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the state of Nevada jointly filed a lawsuit on Thursday, alleging the company used deceptive tactics and exaggerated income claims to lure thousands of individuals into its schemes.

A global investment training company operating under multiple brand identities has come under intense legal scrutiny after being accused of defrauding consumers of over $1 billion. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the state of Nevada jointly filed a lawsuit on Thursday, alleging the company used deceptive tactics and exaggerated income claims to lure thousands of individuals into its schemes.
The business, collectively known as IML, conducted operations under various names, including IYOVIA, IM Mastery Academy, iMarketsLive, and IM Academy. It promoted training in areas such as cryptocurrency, binary options, foreign exchange, and stock trading. Regulators claim that while IML promised substantial financial returns, internal data painted a far bleaker picture.

According to the complaint, IMLs marketing suggested that individuals could earn as much as $750,000 a month. However, the reality was starkly different. Only a small fraction, roughly 20%, of participants made more than $500 in sales commissions. For the majority, average annual earnings amounted to just $77.51 in 2022.
The FTC highlighted that the organisation primarily targeted young adults through social media campaigns, particularly those aimed at college students. Investigations revealed that many of IMLs so-called “educators” lacked formal financial qualifications, often relying on content from platforms such as YouTube or internally generated promotional materials. This raised concerns about the quality and legitimacy of the training provided.
Furthermore, data indicated that nearly 90% of customers ceased using IMLs services within six months of joining, which is a figure that regulators interpret as a strong signal of consumer dissatisfaction and potential financial harm.
The FTC contends that IML functioned as a multi-level marketing (MLM) operation. Members were encouraged to recruit new participants while selling access to the companys educational content. This recruitment-driven structure, according to the lawsuit, allowed the firm to amass approximately $1.2 billion from consumers since 2018 under misleading premises.
The company‘s founders, Christopher Terry and Isis Terry, are named in the lawsuit, along with leading promoters Jason Brown, Alex Morton, Matthew Rosa, and Brandon Boyd. They face charges of violating several federal laws, including the FTC Act, the Telemarketing Sales Rule, and the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act.
Regulators stressed the severity of the alleged misconduct. The FTCs Bureau of Consumer Protection emphasised the broad scale of the operation and the significant damage inflicted, particularly on younger consumers seeking financial independence. The agency underscored that unrealistic income projections and unsupported claims of financial expertise misled many individuals.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

A doctor in Pahang lost over RM880,000 in a fake share scheme promising high returns

A Kuching man lost RM728,800 after being lured by a fake share investment advertised on social media, later discovering the scheme was non-existent when he was unable to withdraw the promised returns.

FIBO Group has grabbed attention from traders for mostly the wrong reasons, as traders have accused the broker of causing financial losses using malicious tactics. Whether it is about withdrawal access, deposit disappearance, trade manipulation, or awful customer support service, the broker is receiving flak from traders on all aspects online. Our team accumulated a list of complaints against the FIBO Group broker. Let’s screen these with us in this FIBO Group review article.

Do you have to pay taxes or margin when seeking fund withdrawals from GMO-Z.com, a Thailand-based forex broker? Do you witness heavy slippage when trading on the broker’s platform? These are some complaints traders have made against the broker. In this GMO-Z.com review article, we have explained these complaints. Take a look!