简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
EU Regulators Imposed Over €71M in Sanctions in 2024, ESMA Calls for Enforcement Convergence
Abstract:A new report by ESMA reveals that national regulators across the EU issued more than 970 sanctions totaling €71 million in 2024. While market abuse and MiFID II violations dominated the fines, the agency highlighted the fragmented enforcement landscape across member states.

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its first consolidated enforcement report, revealing that financial regulators across the European Union imposed over 970 sanctions in 2024, amounting to more than €71 million in fines. The penalties were mainly for violations under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) and the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II).
The report, which covers enforcement actions from all 27 EU member states, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway, highlights significant disparities in enforcement approaches. While some national competent authorities (NCAs) favor administrative fines, others rely on warnings or business restrictions.
“The report highlighted the need for greater convergence in sanctioning by NCAs,” ESMA stated, pointing to the lack of consistency in how financial misconduct is punished across the bloc.
Among the national regulators, Cyprus CySEC stood out by conducting over 850 audits, issuing €2.76 million in fines, and withdrawing several licenses. This signals a continued focus on investor protection and regulatory tightening.
In addition to compiling the data, ESMA took direct enforcement action last year, including sanctions against Scope Ratings GmbH for conflicts of interest and the withdrawal of licenses from several data and rating agencies.
The publication comes alongside ESMAs broader strategic objectives. In 2024, ESMA pushed forward reforms such as T+1 settlement cycle work, crypto-asset regulatory frameworks, ESG term usage in fund names, and the launch of the European Single Access Point (ESAP), expected to go live in 2026.
Looking ahead, ESMA will begin supervising ESG rating providers and EU green bond verifiers, further expanding its role as the EUs central market watchdog.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Apex Markets Review: Traders Outraged Over Withdrawal Denials & Other Trading Issues
Struggling to access fund withdrawals from Apex Markets for months? Does the broker remain silent on fund withdrawal issues? Does the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker reject your winning trades? Have you failed to get a refund into the card used for deposits? Did the broker deduct from your trading account instead? Traders have been imposing these scam allegations while sharing the Apex Markets Review online. We read the reviews and shared some of them below. Take a look!

Aron Groups Review: Fund Losses, High Commission & Trade Manipulation Keep Traders on Tenterhooks
Have you lost your hard-earned capital while trading via Aron Groups Broker? Has the high commission charged by the broker substantially reduced your trading profits? Does the Marshall Islands-based forex broker constantly manipulate spreads to widen your capital losses? Have you been lured into trading courtesy of Aron Groups No Deposit Bonus, only to find that you had to deposit capital to get a bonus? All these and many more trading issues have become synonymous with the experience of Aron Groups’ traders. Consequently, many traders have shared negative Aron Groups reviews online. In this article, we have shared some of their reviews.

JP Markets Review: High Spread & Commission, Fake Bonus Lure & Withdrawal Hassles Frustrate Traders
Have you been lured into opening a JP Markets Forex Trading Account with a high bonus offer that never existed? Have you found the spread and commission charges higher on JP Markets Login than what’s advertised on the broker’s website? Wondering why you are not able to withdraw funds from your trading account? Well, all of these hint at a potential forex investment scam. Many traders have expressed their disappointment while sharing the JP Markets Review online. In this article, we have shared certain complaints. Take a look at them.

Exclusive Markets Under the Scanner: Traders Report High Swap Charges, Deposit Discrepancies & More
Is your forex trading account experience at Exclusive Markets far from good? Do you witness high swap fees and daily charges? Does the deposit fail to reflect in your Exclusive Markets Login? Don’t receive adequate response from the customer support official on your trading queries? You are not alone! Traders have already alleged that the forex broker is involved in these activities. In this Exclusive Markets WikiFX review article, we shared some traders’ comments. Read on to know about them.

