Doctor loses RM880,000 in fake share investment scam
A doctor in Pahang lost over RM880,000 in a fake share scheme promising high returns
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:A recent case involving the theft of 783 BTC (worth approximately $91.4 million) underscores the growing sophistication of cybercriminals targeting digital asset holders.

A recent case involving the theft of 783 BTC (worth approximately $91.4 million) underscores the growing sophistication of cybercriminals targeting digital asset holders.
According to the report, the victim was deceived after fraudsters impersonated a hardware wallet support agent, gaining direct access to their crypto wallet. This initial deception was reinforced by a carefully orchestrated social engineering campaign—a tactic that has become increasingly prevalent in the crypto sector.
The criminals further bolstered their credibility by posing as senior UK police officers, fabricating an elaborate story about a supposed security breach. The victim was told that an arrested individuals phone contained personal identification documents linked to them, leading them to believe their Bitcoin was at risk. Under this pressure, they were ultimately persuaded to hand over control of their assets.
This case reflects a troubling trend in crypto fraud: attackers are no longer relying solely on phishing emails or malware, but instead on psychological manipulation, trust exploitation, and impersonation of authoritative figures. The blending of technical compromise with social engineering tactics makes these scams particularly difficult to detect, even for experienced investors.
Industry experts warn that as crypto adoption continues to expand, attackers will increasingly target individuals rather than institutions, exploiting fear and urgency to pressure victims into compliance. They emphasize the importance of:
With losses already topping billions in the first half of the year, the trajectory suggests that 2025 could set a new record for crypto-related fraud. This latest $91.4 million theft is a stark reminder that while digital assets offer freedom and opportunity, they also demand heightened vigilance and security awareness.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

A doctor in Pahang lost over RM880,000 in a fake share scheme promising high returns

A Kuching man lost RM728,800 after being lured by a fake share investment advertised on social media, later discovering the scheme was non-existent when he was unable to withdraw the promised returns.

FIBO Group has grabbed attention from traders for mostly the wrong reasons, as traders have accused the broker of causing financial losses using malicious tactics. Whether it is about withdrawal access, deposit disappearance, trade manipulation, or awful customer support service, the broker is receiving flak from traders on all aspects online. Our team accumulated a list of complaints against the FIBO Group broker. Let’s screen these with us in this FIBO Group review article.

Do you have to pay taxes or margin when seeking fund withdrawals from GMO-Z.com, a Thailand-based forex broker? Do you witness heavy slippage when trading on the broker’s platform? These are some complaints traders have made against the broker. In this GMO-Z.com review article, we have explained these complaints. Take a look!