WikiFX Deep Dive Review: ExpertOption
Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Singapore uncovers a multi-million AI trading scam tied to C7 Traders. Investors lost over $4.6M after being misled by fake apps and false returns.

An elaborate investment scheme in Singapore has collapsed, exposing how the promise of AI-powered trading was used to mislead investors. At the center of the case is the platform name C7 Traders, which was presented as the venue for automated trades but later revealed to be part of a carefully constructed façade. Authorities say millions were lost before the operation came to light.
Ong Kai Min, 42, director of Singapore Index Trading Institute (SITI), Bookhero, OKM Holdings, and C7 Traders Vanuatu, pleaded guilty to cheating offenses. Between mid-2019 and early 2021, investors were told their funds would be executed via automated AI trades on the platform C7 Traders, through a mobile app displaying fabricated account activity and returns. In truth, no real trading occurred; deposits went into accounts controlled by Ongs companies.
Investors were instructed to open accounts and deposit funds into Bookhero or SITI controlled accounts, with false assurances of returns between 2–10% per month. Some payouts—totaling over S$283,000—were made to sustain credibility, but the majority of funds were used for personal and business expenses.
Ong faces twenty‑three counts of cheating under the Penal Code and one count of obstructing justice for ordering staff to delete company records and reformat computers before the platforms sudden collapse. Under Singapore law, each cheating charge carries up to 10 years in prison, and the obstruction charge up to 7 years.
The scheme has received 30 investor complaints filed with the Commercial Affairs Department.
This incident illustrates how high-tech promises and perceived institutional credibility can be weaponized in financial fraud. Claims of AI-driven trading and guaranteed returns demand scrutiny.
A quick check on WikiFX shows that C7 Traders (via C7 Traders Vanuatu) has no valid regulatory license. Its license from Vanuatu has been revoked, and the platform is flagged for “suspicious license,” “suspicious business scope,” and high user risk. WikiFX strongly advises against engagement.

Investors should always verify a platforms legitimacy using tools like WikiFX Query Tool, which provides regulatory status, verified URLs, and user complaint records—crucial for avoiding scams masked as innovation.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.

If you are looking into ICM Capital (also known simply as ICM), you might be attracted by their established history since 2017 or their access to the MetaTrader platforms. However, glancing at the surface isn't enough when your capital is at risk. With a concerning WikiFX Score of 2.46 out of 10, this broker is currently flashing warning signals that every potential client needs to understand before hitting the "Deposit" button.

In the world of online trading, trust is the currency that matters most. However, recent data aggregation by WikiFX has signaled a "level red" alert regarding Tradeview Markets. Between July and November 2025, our support center was flooded with complaints alleging that the broker unilaterally wiped out account balances under the guise of "negative balance reversal," while simultaneously employing "account deletion" tactics in Asian markets. This report investigates the alarming patterns behind these complaints and analyzes why existing regulations failed to protect these traders.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.