简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Chase-Plaid Deal Sets Banking Fee Precedent
Abstract:JPMorgan Chase-Plaid agreement introduces fees for bank data access, setting new precedent for open banking partnerships in the financial technology sector.

JPMorgan Chase and fintech data broker Plaid have established a groundbreaking fee-based data access agreement that introduces paid partnerships to U.S. open banking, potentially reshaping how financial institutions monetize customer data connections.
The renewed partnership, announced this week, marks the first time JPMorgan will receive payment from Plaid for accessing customer account information used by popular financial applications including Venmo and Robinhood. This fee structure represents a significant shift in the relationship between traditional banks and financial technology companies, establishing a new revenue model that could influence industry-wide practices.
New Revenue Model Emerges
The agreement ensures uninterrupted service for millions of Chase customers who rely on Plaid-connected applications while introducing a compensation framework for data access services. Although specific financial terms remain undisclosed, the deal preserves existing pricing structures for fintech partners and includes provisions for joint security and performance investments.
Eric Sager, Plaid's chief operating officer, emphasized the consumer-focused nature of the partnership. The company maintains that customers retain fundamental rights to access and share their financial data, positioning this agreement as supporting rather than restricting those capabilities.
Technical Infrastructure Evolution
The partnership builds upon a 2018 foundation when JPMorgan became among the first major banks to replace screen-scraping technology with direct API connections. Screen scraping involved using customer login credentials to extract bank data, a method considered less secure and more cumbersome than modern tokenized API systems.

JPMorgan's motivation for implementing fees stems from substantial infrastructure costs associated with constant data requests. The bank reported significant volumes of background API calls, many unrelated to direct consumer activity, creating operational expenses that the new fee structure aims to address.
Regulatory Landscape Context
This development occurs amid ongoing Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rulemaking under Section 1033, which seeks to establish comprehensive open banking standards nationwide. The regulatory process has extended across multiple administrations, leaving financial institutions and data aggregators to negotiate private agreements while awaiting federal guidelines.
Industry standards organization FDX reports that API-based account connections now exceed 110 million in the United States, representing substantial growth from previous years. This expansion demonstrates increasing consumer adoption of financial technology services requiring bank data integration.
Market Implications
Plaid's business model faces continued evolution following previous challenges, including a blocked $5.3 billion Visa acquisition due to antitrust concerns and a $58 million privacy lawsuit settlement. The company has repositioned itself as an advocate for standardized regulations and consumer data rights.
The current agreement covers data aggregation services but excludes payment-related functions such as account verification and transaction initiation, which represent nearly half of Plaid's traffic volume. Future fee structures for these services remain uncertain, potentially affecting peer-to-peer payment platforms and instant transfer capabilities.
Consumer Impact Assessment
End users will experience no immediate changes to their financial applications, as Plaid commits to maintaining current functionality without passing additional costs to consumers. The agreement provides operational stability while regulators complete the open banking framework development.
However, the precedent established by JPMorgan's fee implementation may encourage other major banks to pursue similar revenue strategies. This trend could fundamentally alter the economics of financial data sharing and influence the competitive landscape among data aggregators.
About JPMorgan: JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the largest bank in the United States by assets, providing comprehensive financial services including consumer banking, investment banking, and asset management to individuals, businesses, and institutions worldwide.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Apex Markets Review: Traders Outraged Over Withdrawal Denials & Other Trading Issues
Struggling to access fund withdrawals from Apex Markets for months? Does the broker remain silent on fund withdrawal issues? Does the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker reject your winning trades? Have you failed to get a refund into the card used for deposits? Did the broker deduct from your trading account instead? Traders have been imposing these scam allegations while sharing the Apex Markets Review online. We read the reviews and shared some of them below. Take a look!

tastyfx Exposed: Fund Losses, Trade Manipulation & Account Related Hassles Hurt Traders
Are fund losses normal for you at tastyfx? Does the US-based forex broker constantly manipulate prices to hit your trading experience? Do you fail to receive a reply from the broker on your fund withdrawal requests? Do you constantly face trading account issues with tastyfx? It’s time to read the tastyfx review shared by traders online.

Aron Groups Review: Fund Losses, High Commission & Trade Manipulation Keep Traders on Tenterhooks
Have you lost your hard-earned capital while trading via Aron Groups Broker? Has the high commission charged by the broker substantially reduced your trading profits? Does the Marshall Islands-based forex broker constantly manipulate spreads to widen your capital losses? Have you been lured into trading courtesy of Aron Groups No Deposit Bonus, only to find that you had to deposit capital to get a bonus? All these and many more trading issues have become synonymous with the experience of Aron Groups’ traders. Consequently, many traders have shared negative Aron Groups reviews online. In this article, we have shared some of their reviews.

Uniglobe Markets Bonus Review: Understanding the Offers and Uncovering the Risks
Many traders start looking for a new broker by searching for special deals and bonuses. The phrase "Uniglobe Markets no deposit bonus" is something people often search for. Let's address this question clearly and directly. Based on all the information we have, Uniglobe Markets does not currently offer a no-deposit bonus. Instead, this broker focuses on bonuses that require you to deposit your own money first. To get any bonus credits, traders must put in their own capital. Read on to learn how this entire bonus works out for traders.
