简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Fed Holds Fire, But ‘Rebel’ Votes Expose Deepening Rifts Under Political Shadow
Abstract:The Federal Reserve maintained rates at 3.50%-3.75%, but a rare dissent from two governors—including a potential Chair candidate—has exposed deep internal fractures amid intensifying political pressure from the White House.

The Federal Reserve voted to maintain its benchmark interest rate target at 3.50%-3.75% on Wednesday, pausing its easing cycle after three consecutive cuts. While the decision matched broad market consensus, the calm surface belied a historic fracture within the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), signaling that the central bank's “neutral” stance is under siege from both economic data and political maneuvering.
The Dissent Heard 'Round the World
In a stunning deviation from the Feds typical consensus-driven approach, Governors Christopher Waller and Stephen Miran voted against the hold, favoring an immediate 25 basis point cut.
This dissent is particularly significant for two reasons:
Powell Defends Independence
Facing the sunset of his tenure and active hostility from the White House—including threats of legal action against the Fed board—Chair Jerome Powell used the press conference to mount a staunch defense of institutional independence.
“Central bank independence is the bedrock of a modern democracy,” Powell stated, implicitly pushing back against President Trumps recent threats. However, with the prediction markets now pricing in a higher probability of Waller succeeding Powell, traders are beginning to price in a “politicized Fed” discount into the dollar and long-end Treasuries.
Market Implications
- Policy Path: Futures markets are now confused. The official “hold” suggests patience, but the internal pressure suggests a pivot could be forced sooner than data warrants. Markets are pricing in a resumption of cuts potentially by June, coinciding with the leadership transition.
- USD Impact: The lack of a unified front weakens the Dollar's yield appeal slightly, though geopolitical safe-haven flows are currently masking this weakness.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
