简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Kraken Review: Safety, Regulation & Forex Trading Details
Abstract:Kraken currently holds a low safety score of 1.58 on WikiFX due to a complete lack of valid regulation and official warnings from Indonesian financial authorities. Recent user data highlights severe risks, including account lockouts and schemes requiring payment of additional fees to access funds.

When evaluating a trading partner, the Safety Score is often the first indicator of reliability. In this Kraken review, we analyze the financial status, regulatory standing, and user feedback regarding this broker. Despite a high influence ranking in regions like the UAE and Argentina, Kraken currently presents significant risks for Forex and crypto investors due to its regulatory status.
Key Takeaways
- Critical Safety Score: WikiFX rates this entity at 1.58/10, a level associated with high-risk platforms.
- No Verified Regulation: The broker operates without valid oversight from major financial bodies.
- Withdrawal Barriers: Multiple users report being asked to pay “taxes” or “fees” (up to 20% or $30,000) to access their own funds.
- Regulatory Warnings: Listed on the BAPPEBTI blacklists for unauthorized operations.
Kraken Broker Summary
According to WikiFX records, Kraken (established in 2018, US-based claims) holds an influence rank of “AAA”, suggesting it is widely searched, likely due to its name similarity with major exchanges or aggressive marketing. However, popularity does not equal safety. The platform lacks a valid trading environment rank and has accumulated 17 complaints in just the last three months.
Investors should be aware that while the broker claims to offer customer service via social channels like Twitter and Facebook, the lack of a verified physical address or official license creates a dangerous gap in accountability.
Kraken Regulation: Is the License Real?
A legitimate Forex license protects traders from fraud. WikiFX data confirms that this specific Kraken profile operates without valid regulation.
| Regulator | License Type | Status |
|---|---|---|
| US Authorities | No License Found | Unregulated |
| BAPPEBTI (Indonesia) | Regulatory Warning | Unauthorized / Blocked |
Regulatory Disclosures
The Indonesian regulator BAPPEBTI has issued specific warnings regarding this entity:
1. Unauthorized Activity: The Trade Ministry blocked domains associated with this entity for operating without a license.
2. Illegal Operation: It was listed among entities conducting unauthorized commodity futures trading, sometimes under the guise of gambling or binary options.
Analyst Note: Valid US brokers must be registered with the NFA or CFTC. There is no record of such registration for this entity in the provided data.
User Reviews: Kraken Login and Withdrawal Complaints
In our analysis of user feedback, specific patterns of “fee fraud” and login failures have emerged. The complaints suggest that investors effectively lose control of their capital once it is deposited.
1. The “Task” and “VIP” Investment Trap
Reports from Bolivia and Argentina describe a “task-based” scam. Users are invited to join Telegram groups where they must complete tasks (like subscribing to channels) to earn commissions.
- The Trap: Initially, small withdrawals work. However, the system soon demands a “minimum investment” to continue.
- The result: One user noted, “I cannot withdraw my money until I complete my last 2 tasks... after that they ask for high amounts.”

2. High Fees to Unlock Funds
Investors in China reported that Kraken refused withdrawals unless a massive additional deposit was made.
- Asset Logic: One case mentioned a requirement to recharge “20% of total assets” to withdraw.
- AML Excuses: Another user reported being told they needed to pay $30,000 for “advanced certification” under the pretense of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) rules.
3. System Blackouts and Login Issues
A report from July 2024 highlights a potential Kraken login failure, where the user opened the app to find it “all blank” after previously being told to deposit USDT to activate the account. This lack of access prevents users from verifying their balances or contacting support.
Conclusion: Final Kraken Review Recommendation
Based on the WikiFX score of 1.58, the lack of verified regulation, and the severe nature of complaints regarding “task scams” and blocked withdrawals, we strongly advise investors to avoid this broker. The pattern of demanding extra payments (taxes, verification fees) to release funds is a critical warning sign common in unregulated platforms.
Recommendation: Prioritize brokers with verified licenses from top-tier regulators like the FCA (UK) or ASIC (Australia) to ensure your capital is protected.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
