WikiFX

Rispondi

As an experienced forex trader, I need to be frank—my primary concern with RR is the total lack of transparent regulatory oversight. According to my due diligence, RR operates with a "suspicious regulatory license" and no verifiable regulation, so I approach any details related to spreads or trading costs with substantial skepticism. My ability to assess the actual trading environment, such as the typical spread for EUR/USD on a standard account, is severely limited by this lack of transparency. When I evaluate brokers, the spread on major pairs like EUR/USD is critical, but just as important is independent regulatory validation of the broker's claims. In the case of RR, there is simply no reliable or independently audited information available regarding spreads. This means that, for me, any published numbers—or promises—regarding spreads must be treated with caution, as there is no way for traders to verify if trading costs are fair, fixed, or subject to manipulation. Personally, I would not risk trading EUR/USD or any other pair with RR, given that cost disclosures cannot be trusted in the absence of regulation or third-party verification. For such a core parameter as the spread, my comfort as a trader comes only when I see comprehensive, regulator-backed transparency. This is not the case here, and I would urge others to exercise strong caution for the same reasons.