WikiFX

Rispondi

Speaking from my perspective as an independent trader with a strong focus on risk management and broker transparency, I must stress that ETC does not provide any clear information—at least from what is publicly available—regarding inactivity fees. This absence of detail in their disclosures is, for me, a significant concern. ETC operates without valid regulatory oversight and offers only very limited transparency about their trading terms and conditions, including key topics such as fees. In my own experience, regulatory brokers typically detail all their charges, including inactivity fees, as part of their client agreement, which provides traders with essential clarity before trading or even opening an account. Given that ETC is unregulated and information about its business scope is flagged as suspicious, I approach this lack of fee transparency with a high degree of caution. Without regulatory supervision or a published fee schedule, it's impossible for me to confirm whether inactivity fees exist or under what conditions they might be applied. That ambiguity increases the risk for anyone considering this broker; hidden or unexpected fees are a real possibility in unregulated environments. Personally, I would not proceed with an ETC account without full written confirmation about all fee structures, including inactivity charges, and I strongly advise others to be similarly vigilant before engaging.