WikiFX

Rispondi

After reviewing the available information, I could not find any clear or detailed mention of inactivity fees being charged by RGL. As someone highly attentive to fee structures due to their significant impact on trading costs, this lack of transparency is concerning for me. When choosing a broker, I always look for explicit information on all potential charges, especially those that might catch traders off guard, such as inactivity or maintenance fees. I believe it's essential to know precisely under what conditions a fee might be applied, such as the length of account dormancy or specific criteria, to avoid unnecessary surprises—yet in RGL's case, these critical details seem absent. Given that RGL is currently unregulated and already flagged for a suspicious scope of business and high potential risk, the absence of a full fee schedule—including policies about inactivity—raises even more red flags for me. In my experience, reputable brokers prioritize clarity, ensuring clients can make informed financial decisions. Without documented guidance on this issue, I would not assume there are zero inactivity fees; rather, I consider the lack of information a signal to proceed with utmost caution. Until RGL publishes more comprehensive and transparent terms, particularly regarding all potential costs tied to account use or non-use, I cannot recommend treating their platform as risk-free from hidden or unexpected charges.