WikiFX

Rispondi

As an independent trader with years of experience evaluating brokers, I take a cautious and evidence-based approach when assessing any platform’s fee structure, especially surrounding inactivity fees. When I thoroughly reviewed the available information about BOT, I found no specific mention of inactivity fees or conditions under which such fees might be applied. This is noteworthy because transparency in fee schedules is a foundational aspect of trust when choosing a trading venue. However, the absence of clear details regarding inactivity fees does not provide assurance that none exist; more concerningly, BOT operates without regulatory oversight, and user feedback highlights significant risk factors, including severe withdrawal problems and accusations of being a scam. In my professional judgment, platforms lacking a straightforward, regulated, and publicly disclosed fee structure—including clear policies on inactivity—should be treated with extreme caution. For me, the combination of unverified regulatory status and unresolved allegations from users signals that prospective clients should not engage or fund accounts until all fees, including those regarding account inactivity, are transparently confirmed through official, direct channels. Given how these unresolved issues can impact account balances or inhibit withdrawals, it is critically important not to assume the absence of inactivity fees or other hidden charges.