简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
FINRA Penalties And Regulation SHO Breaches At WEDBUSH Securities
Abstract:Wedbush Securities, Inc. violated Regulation SHO Rules 204(a), (b), and (c) and FINRA Rule 2010 by failing to timely close out 2,056 fail-to-deliver positions as required by Rule 204(a), failing to place securities in the "penalty box" as required by Rule 204(b), and failing to comply with the notice requirement of Rule 204(c).

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) penalized Wedbush Securities for suspected Regulation SHO breaches.
Wedbush Securities, Inc. violated Regulation SHO Rules 204(a), (b), and (c) and FINRA Rule 2010 by failing to timely close out approximately 2,056 fail-to-deliver positions as required by Rule 204(a), and on approximately 390 occasions failing to place securities in the “penalty box” as required by Rule 204(b) and failing to comply with the notice requirement of Ru (c).

The Securities and Exchange Commission enacted Regulation SHO to address concerns about frequent failures to deliver and possibly abusive “naked” short selling, i.e., the sale of securities that an investor does not own or has not borrowed.
Regulation SHO sets various obligations on broker-dealers in the sale of equities securities in order to enhance market stability, maintain investor trust, and boost short-sale transparency. These requirements include Regulation SHO Rule 204(a close-out )'s provisions, Rule 204(b) penalty box's provision, which restricts short selling in securities when the close-out requirement is not met unless the broker-dealer borrows or arranges to borrow the security, and Rule 204(notice )'s provision, which requires a firm to provide written notice to any customer for whom the firm clears and settles trades when it enters and leaves the penalty box.
Failure to deliver (FTD) happens when a seller fails to deliver securities to the buyer when delivery is due.
When Wedbush experienced an FTD, the firm's automated system sought to detect the FTD and borrow or recall shares to close it out. If the automated method failed to acquire the shares, company personnel were needed to borrow, recall, or purchase shares to complete the FTD. Business personnel, on the other hand, failed to properly recall shares that had been out on loan or to perform buy-ins when the firm began a stock loan recall but did not receive the shares in time to send them to the Continuous Net Settlement System (“CNS”).
During the relevant periods, the company failed to close down approximately 2,056 FTD holdings on time owing to the firm's failure to promptly borrow shares, recall shares that were out on loan, or otherwise purchase and deliver shares in line with Rule 204. (a).
Furthermore, between January 1, 2016, and July 31, 2020, the firm failed to place a security in which it had failed to obtain a close-out into the penalty box, as required by Regulation SHO Rule 204(b), and to send a notice that the firm had a position in any equity security that had not been closed out, as required by Regulation SHO Rule 204. (c).
As a result, the respondent breached Regulation SHO Rules 204(a), (b), and (c), as well as FINRA Rule 2010.
During the relevant years, the firm also violated FINRA Rules 3110 and 2010 by failing to develop and maintain a supervisory system, including documented supervisory procedures, reasonably tailored to achieve compliance with Regulation SHO Rules 204(a) and 204(b) (c).
The company has consented to a censure and a $900,000 punishment (of which $450,000 will be allocated to FINRA).
WikiFX Facts
WikiFX is a worldwide corporate financial information search engine. Its primary duty is to give basic information searching, regulatory license seeking, the credit assessment, platform identification, and other services to the included foreign exchange trading firms.

The portal lists approximately 39,000 brokers, both legal and unregistered. WikiFX's staff has been working hard with 30 financial regulators from across the world to guarantee that the information supplied is factual and correct.
Stay tuned for more Regulatory News.
Download the WikiFX App from the App Store or Google Play Store.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

CHINA BEST Broker Review: Regulation and Risks
CHINA BEST review of regulation, license, and broker operations in Hong Kong. Analysis of SFC oversight, client safety, and risk alerts.

Uniglobe Markets Review 2025: A Safe Broker or a High-Risk Scam?
When looking at a broker, the most important question is always about safety: "Is Uniglobe Markets Safe Or Scam?" After carefully studying how it operates and its regulatory status, the answer is clear. Uniglobe Markets works without any proper financial regulation from a trusted authority. This fact alone is the biggest warning sign for any potential investor. This lack of oversight gets worse when you add the multiple official warnings from financial regulators across Europe and a pattern of serious problems reported by users, especially with withdrawals. This review will give you a detailed, fact-based look at these important points, breaking down what the broker offers and the risks involved to help you make a smart decision.

Saxo Bank Sale Talks Surface After Failed IPO Attempt
Saxo Bank explores a possible sale valued at up to $2.1B after scrapped SPAC listing, drawing interest from private equity, asset managers, and European banks.

Bold Prime Regulation: Is There Really A License?
Bold Prime Regulation Review: ASIC license revoked. Learn the risks of trading with unregulated brokers and why oversight matters.

