GmtFX Flagged for Operating Without Authorisation as Regulatory and Risk Signals Mount
GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Recently, a Malaysian investor said that the Ponzi scheme Herzen is rampant in Malaysia and cheated many Malaysians.

The investor frankly said that the Ponzi scheme like Hezhen International Herzen uses Multilevel direct selling, robbing Peter to pay Paul - using the money of the new members to pay the old members. In this framework, the essence of which is a Ponzi scheme, or what we often call a pyramid scheme fraud.
The Brand - Herzen
The investigation has found that Herzen is a platform with a “story”. Its domain name herzen-intcare.com was established on August 4, 2022, only 4 months ago.

The history of Herzen can be traced back to its “former domain herzen-int.com”, which was created on December 29, 2021, and officially launched in January of that year. But it didn't take long for the site to be exposed as an incarnation of the exposed Ponzi scheme Prima. In the early days, even the company's introduction and customer service WeChat IDs were identical, and a stupid joke that it forgot to change the company's name in the official document Disclaimer was made. At last, the domain was abandoned after less than a year of use, and now automatically jumps to herzen-intcare.com.

After replacing the new domain herzen-intcare.com, the group simply removed all information related to the platform's regulatory information, terms & conditions, privacy policy, regulatory documents, etc.
According to its lecture to customers, the platform advertised that it holds a license from Labuan Financial Services Authority (Labuan FSA), and the company name is AIFC TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, which provides financial derivatives such as CFD, precious metals, crude oil, indices, and cryptocurrencies.
We do can find a company named AIFC Technology Ltd, but the approved domain was neither herzen-intcare.com nor herzen-int.com, which means Herzen is not regulated by Labuan FSA.


Two Logos
What is particularly obvious is that the logos under different language modes on Herzen's website are different.

Herzen also claims to have European Credit Investment Bank (ECIB) to provide fund custody services, but ECIB issued a warning on its official website stating that it has no relationship with Herzen or Prima.


Three Platforms - From Prima to AIFC and Herzen
What investors need to note is that the AIFC platform's official website was registered on September 15, 2021, and the very first registrar was Prima in Malaysia. And it was only after it was discovered by netizens on September 30, 2021, that the registrar changed its name to AIFC Technology Ltd. It is obvious that from Prima to AIFC and Herzen, all these fraudulent platforms are created by the same group of people, old wine in a new bottle.
Additionally, Herzen was blacklisted by the Malaysian Securities Commission (SC) for providing financial derivatives investment services without authorization.

All in all, Herzen is definitely a scam.
WikiFX Reminds You
WikiFX reminds that Herzen is not only a Ponzi scheme for Malaysians but many victims in China and Southeast Asia show up one after another.
Identifying Ponzi schemes is not difficult. If you want to participate in an investment project with high returns, and there are multiple levels of the market commission system, it can be sure that the project is a Ponzi scheme. The consequence will not only be losing money but also hurting your interpersonal relationships!

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.

A close look at ZarVista's regulatory status shows major red flags that mark it as a high-risk broker for traders. This analysis goes beyond the company's marketing materials to examine the real substance of its licenses, business structure, and operating history. The main issues we will explore include its dependence on weak offshore regulation, a large number of serious user complaints, and worrying details about its corporate identity. It is also important to note that ZarVista previously operated under the name Zara FX, a detail that provides important background to its history. This article aims to deliver a complete, evidence-based breakdown of the ZarVista license framework and its real-world effects, helping traders understand the serious risks involved before investing.

Warning: Multibank Group faces multiple allegations of scams in Vietnam, the UAE, and Italy. Reports include blocked withdrawals, confiscated profits, and fraudulent practices. Stay vigilant and protect your funds.

When traders think about choosing a new broker, two main questions come up: Is ZarVista safe or a scam? And what are the common ZarVista complaints? These questions get to the heart of what matters most—keeping your capital safe. This article gives you a detailed look at ZarVista's reputation using public information, government records, and real experiences from people who used their services. Our research starts with an important fact that shapes this whole review. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers independently, gives ZarVista a trust score of only 2.07 out of 10. This very low rating comes with a clear warning: "Low score, please stay away!" The main reason for this low score is the large number of user complaints. This finding shows that ZarVista might be risky to use. To get the complete picture, we will look at the broker's government approval status, examine the specific complaints from users, check any positive reviews to be fair, and give you a final answer based on fact