简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Morgan Stanley agrees to settle SEC charges by paying more than $249M.
Abstract:The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently brought charges against Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, a leading investment banking institution, and its former head of the equity syndicate desk, Pawan Passi.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently brought charges against Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, a leading investment banking institution, and its former head of the equity syndicate desk, Pawan Passi.
These charges are linked to a prolonged fraud scheme involving the improper disclosure of confidential information related to significant stock transactions known as “block trades.” Additionally, the SEC has accused Morgan Stanley of failing to adhere to policies designed to prevent the misuse of material non-public information related to block trades, which typically involve the private arrangement and execution of substantial quantities of a company's shares outside of public markets.
The SEC alleges that Morgan Stanley and Passi shared information about impending block trades with certain buy-side investors, anticipating that these investors would use the information strategically. Specifically, these investors were expected to take substantial short positions in the stock associated with the upcoming block trade. If Morgan Stanley proceeded with the block trade, these investors would then request and receive allocations from Morgan Stanley to cover their short positions, effectively mitigating the bank's risk.
The SEC's investigation, covering the period from June 2018 to August 2021, revealed that Passi and a subordinate on Morgan Stanley's equity syndicate desk disclosed non-public information about imminent block trades to specific buy-side investors. This occurred despite explicit confidentiality requests from the sellers and Morgan Stanley's internal policies governing the handling of confidential data.
Furthermore, the SEC's order highlights Morgan Stanley's failure to implement effective information barriers, preventing the transmission of material non-public information from the equity syndicate desk (located on the private side of the firm) to a trading division on the public side. This lapse hindered the firm's ability to scrutinize whether trades by the public side, conducted while discussions were ongoing with selling shareholders about potential block trades, were based on confidential information.
The SEC's order against Morgan Stanley asserts that the firm knowingly violated Sections 10(b) and 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, along with Rule 10b-5(b) thereunder. As a result, the SEC censured the firm and imposed financial penalties, requiring payment of approximately $138 million in disgorgement, about $28 million in prejudgment interest, and an $83 million civil penalty. In the case of Passi, the SEC's order states that he willfully violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, leading to a $250,000 civil penalty, along with associational, penny stock, and supervisory bars.
Concurrently, the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York has reached criminal resolutions with Morgan Stanley and Passi. Notably, the SEC's disgorgement and prejudgment interest requirements for Morgan Stanley will be deemed partially satisfied by the firm's forfeiture and restitution of $136,531,223 as part of its criminal resolution.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!
