GmtFX Flagged for Operating Without Authorisation as Regulatory and Risk Signals Mount
GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:OmegaPro promised financial freedom through high-yield trading, but for thousands of investors across Latin America and beyond, the dream has dissolved into a nightmare of "hacks," forced platform migrations, and indefinite frozen funds.

OmegaPro promised financial freedom through high-yield trading, but for thousands of investors across Latin America and beyond, the dream has dissolved into a nightmare of “hacks,” forced platform migrations, and indefinite frozen funds.
All cases mentioned in this report are based on real user complaints submitted to WikiFX; to protect the privacy of the victims, their identities have been anonymized.
In the world of online trading, technical maintenance is a standard, usually brief, procedure. However, for investors of OmegaPro, a supposed system update has mutated into a permanent blockade of their life savings. Our investigation into the surge of complaints against OmegaPro reveals a highly coordinated pattern of delay tactics that resembles a digital shell game rather than a legitimate financial operation.
The narrative began shifting drastically in late 2022 and early 2023. At that time, OmegaPro announced a “cyberattack” or “hack” on their systems. This event served as the pretext for freezing withdrawals. Rather than fixing the issue and returning funds to the original accounts, the company directed its massive user base to migrate their capital to a new, obscure entity known as “Broker Group.”
For a trader from Ecuador, this transition marked the beginning of the end. He reported that after investing two years ago and initially withdrawing profits, the official page ceased functioning. He was advised, along with other partners, to transfer his money to Broker Group. Since that transfer, not only has withdrawal been impossible, but his access to the platform has also been revoked.
This was not an isolated incident. A user from Colombia described a similar trajectory: “OmegaPro stated they were hacked and transferred my resources to Broker Group. It has been 18 months since my deposit, and I have not been able to withdraw a single cent.”
What makes the OmegaPro case particularly devastating is the method of recruitment. Unlike standard brokers that rely on digital marketing, OmegaPro appears to have utilized a Multi-Level Marketing (MLM) structure, leveraging personal relationships to secure deposits.
Our analysis of the feedback indicates that many victims were introduced to the platform by friends or “advisors” who promised unrealistic returns. A victim from Peru shared a heartbreaking account of trusting a friend who worked at OmegaPro. The promise was specific and mathematically improbable: invest $1,000, withdraw double in 8 months, or triple it in 16 months.
The reality, however, defied these promises. When the promised withdrawal date arrived, the “hack” excuse was deployed. The victim's funds were frozen, and despite the migration to Broker Group, the last closed operation shown on their account was in January 2023. The money has sat stagnant, a number on a screen that cannot be accessed, while the “traders” supposedly managing the funds have ceased all activity.
This aggressive recruitment strategy has left entire families in financial ruin. An investor from Argentina recounted how he and his family invested $15,000 USD in 2021, believing the company's claims that it would become an industry power. They even traveled to Panama to meet the CEOs. Today, they are left with nothing but regret and the realization that the executives they met have failed to honor their obligations.
The human cost of OmegaPro's operational failure is severe. Many traders did not simply invest disposable income; they took out loans based on the company's assurances of liquidity.
A distressed user from Ecuador wrote to us pleading for help, stating, “I am in debt and I have no way to repair what was lost.” Similarly, a Colombian investor detailed investing $900 plus an additional $186, money secured through a loan they can no longer repay. They were told the platform was in maintenance for 16 months—an unconscionable duration for any legitimate financial institution—before being shunted to the unresponsive Broker Group.
The psychological toll is evident in the tone of the complaints. Fear, panic, and resignation are dominant. Users are finding themselves blocked on social media when they ask questions and are met with “rude” customer support when they do manage to make contact. One potential investor from Malaysia noted that even before depositing, the customer support's attitude was so hostile that it served as a final warning to steer clear.
While OmegaPro claims to operate out of the United Kingdom, a dive into the regulatory data paints a picture of an entity operating in the shadows. A legitimate UK-based broker must be regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). However, OmegaPro holds no such license.
Instead, what we find is a trail of warnings from top-tier regulatory bodies. The WikiFX regulatory database highlights that OmegaPro is not merely unregulated; it has been actively flagged as a danger to the public.
Despite these warnings, the company continued to operate significantly in regions like Colombia, Mexico, and Peru, capitalizing on markets where regulatory warnings from Europe might not be immediately visible to the average retail investor.
| Regulator Name | License Type | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Supervision Authority (Estonia) | No License | Unauthorized (Warning Issued) |
| Financial Services Commission (Mauritius) | No License | Unauthorized (Investor Alert: Pyramid/MLM Warning) |
| Autorité des Marchés Financiers (France) | No License | Unauthorized (Blacklisted) |
The pattern displayed by OmegaPro is textbook behavior for high-risk investment schemes nearing collapse. The sequence of events—aggressive recruitment via social circles, a sudden “hack” or technical failure, followed by a forced migration to a secondary shell company (“Broker Group”)—is designed to obfuscate the flow of funds and exhaust the patience of investors.
Currently, WikiFX has received over 82 complaints in just the last three months, dragging the broker's score down to a dangerous 1.57/10. The evidence suggests that for many, the “maintenance” is permanent, and the “Broker Group” is nothing more than a digital holding cell for funds that may never be released.
We strongly advise all investors to cease depositing funds into OmegaPro or any associated entities immediately. For those already entrapped, the path to recovery is difficult, as the entity operates without the oversight of a compensation fund or a valid regulatory warden.
Risk Warning
The information regarding the regulatory status and details of the broker mentioned above is based on the data available at the time of writing. Forex and CFD trading involves a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. You may lose some or all of your invested capital. WikiFX does not take responsibility for any financial losses incurred. Always verify a broker's license validity directly with the relevant regulatory authority before depositing funds.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.

Long Asia Group, a Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker, has come under increasing scrutiny as a growing number of traders report troubling experiences with the broker’s operations. User feedback highlights recurring issues such as delayed or blocked withdrawals, sudden communication breakdowns, and a lack of clear accountability once funds are deposited. Several traders claim that while small withdrawals may initially go through, larger payout requests often face unexplained obstacles. More concerning are allegations suggesting that the broker may no longer be operating transparently, with users reporting prolonged silence, unresolved complaints and suspected fund mishandling. These patterns have raised serious questions about Long Asia Group’s reliability and overall legitimacy, prompting traders to exercise extreme caution before engaging with the broker. For more details, keep reading this LONG ASIA review article, where we have elaborated on the traders’ pain wit

Has your MY MAA MARKETS forex trading experience been nothing short of a financial misery? Do you fail to gain the forex broker’s approval for fund withdrawals? Were you denied withdrawals on the grounds of fake accusations concerning system abuse and hedging? Does the broker deliberately cause you unwarranted slippage as you start executing winning trades? Do you feel the broker is unregulated? Your concerns seem genuine, as many traders have accused the broker of serious financial misconduct. In this MY MAA MARKETS review article, we have investigated some trader complaints. Take a look!

Selangor police arrested 20 suspects after dismantling three online scam syndicates operating fake job and investment scams across Kajang, Seri Kembangan and Puchong, with multiple devices seized and investigations ongoing.