WikiFX

Reply

After thoroughly researching Firstrade and evaluating both the WikiFX data and user feedback, I have significant reservations about considering this broker as legitimate by the standard measures I apply as an experienced trader. Despite Firstrade operating out of the United States and having a history dating back to 1985, the most critical red flag for me is its lack of regulation by any major financial authority such as the SEC or FINRA. Regulation isn’t just a technicality; it’s a safeguard for traders against malpractice and provides recourse in case of disputes or losses due to broker misconduct. Firstrade’s “suspicious regulatory license” and explicit warnings about a lack of oversight elevate these concerns. While Firstrade offers genuinely attractive conditions—like zero commissions on stocks, ETFs, and mutual funds, and no minimum deposit—the absence of oversight leaves clients without crucial protection. This is especially concerning in the context of some user reviews alleging withdrawal issues and induced investment fraud. Even though there are also positive reviews, I have learned to approach any unregulated broker with extra caution, particularly when users have reported difficulties in accessing their own funds. For me, financial safety always takes precedence over low-cost trading or convenience. Without solid, transparent regulation, I cannot confidently consider Firstrade a trustworthy option for trading, regardless of its long operational history or features.