WikiFX

Reply

Based on my careful evaluation of PGM as detailed in the background information, I have some reservations regarding their suitability for automated trading, particularly through Expert Advisors (EAs). PGM offers access to a diverse array of professional-grade trading platforms such as CQG, CTS, Trading Technology, QST, Bloomberg, FFastFill, InfoReach, CME Group, and Ice. However, none of these platforms are MetaTrader products, which means the widespread plug-and-play style of EAs commonly associated with MT4/MT5 is likely not directly supported. Having traded with several brokers over the years, my experience has shown me that high-end institutional platforms like CQG and Bloomberg tend to support advanced order routing and algorithmic strategies, but they do so in far more complex ways than the typical retail EA. For traders looking to run automated systems, this usually requires custom development—sometimes even institutional-level connectivity or proprietary coding—rather than the straightforward EA deployment I’ve enjoyed on more retail-focused platforms. The WikiFX background does not mention explicit support for EAs or automated trading in retail terms, and combined with the unregulated, high-risk status and “suspicious scope of business,” I approach this broker with significant caution. Ultimately, if running EAs is central to your trading strategy, I would be hesitant to rely on PGM. There’s no clear indication that they facilitate this in the standard sense, and the absence of regulation amplifies the risk in entrusting your automated setup—or capital—to this environment. For me, strict risk management and platform transparency are non-negotiable, especially where automation is involved.