WikiFX

Reply

Based on my careful review of the available information about SIBL, I was not able to find any clear, documented details regarding inactivity fees or the specific conditions under which such fees might be applied. This lack of transparency is concerning from my perspective as an experienced forex trader. In my trading, I have found it essential to only work with brokers who clearly and openly disclose all potential costs, especially inactivity fees, as these can sometimes unexpectedly erode account balances during periods of little or no trading activity. The context I examined indicates SIBL operates without valid regulatory oversight, and this absence of regulation significantly reduces the level of protection and recourse available to traders if unexpected charges or unfavorable terms arise. Without clear fee structures and explicit user agreements, traders may be exposed to risks that are not immediately apparent. In my view, when there is uncertainty about fees such as inactivity charges—and particularly when a broker is flagged with high potential risk and a suspicious regulatory status—it's crucial for safety to either avoid opening an account altogether or to directly contact customer support for written clarification before depositing any funds. For me, lack of transparency is a major red flag in any broker relationship.