WikiFX

Reply

In my direct experience evaluating brokers, I approach platforms like Tiger Markets (test) with a great deal of caution, particularly when assessing their offerings and fee transparency. While Tiger Markets (test) states that it operates with an STP model and provides access to cTrader, the available context does not clearly detail specific trading instruments. I could not identify comprehensive lists of forex pairs, commodities, or indices, nor information about leverage, spreads, or minimum positions, which limits my ability to confidently assess the true breadth of tradable assets. On the subject of fees, I am left with several unanswered questions. Although the platform cites deposit options such as VISA, Neteller, Mastercard, and bank transfer—with some values like "minimum deposit" listed—you’ll notice that key details such as commissions, spreads, and withdrawal charges are missing or inconsistent. For a trader like myself, fee clarity is essential for risk management, and a lack of transparency here is concerning. I also view user reports of operational problems and fund withdrawal issues as significant red flags, outweighing any potential advantages that the stated STP model or software compatibility might provide. In summary, while Tiger Markets (test) mentions several potentially attractive features, the absence of clear, verifiable details on trading instruments and fee structure makes it difficult for me to perceive real advantages, and I would approach any engagement with this broker very conservatively.