WikiFX

Reply

As a trader who spends significant time researching and testing brokers before committing real funds, I have to be very careful when evaluating S&C Inversiones. From what I’ve found, there isn’t clear, published information about the maximum leverage they provide for major forex pairs, nor about any differentiation in leverage across other asset classes like stocks, futures, or mutual funds. This lack of transparency itself is a considerable red flag for me. With regulated brokers, leverage conditions are always explicitly stated, allowing me to accurately assess potential risk exposure. The absence of regulatory oversight for S&C Inversiones means there’s no external authority to confirm or enforce their leverage policies and client protections. In my experience, such ambiguity heightens the risk of unfavorable or unpredictable trading conditions—something I always try to avoid. Reliable brokers usually distinguish leverage levels among asset classes due to their inherently different risk profiles. For instance, forex is often offered at much higher leverage than equities or mutual funds. Here, though, I can’t verify any such distinctions or even basic leverage details. For me, the inability to access concrete leverage information—especially when it comes to risk-heavy products like forex—is enough to approach with serious caution. Without clear, regulated terms, I wouldn’t commit my capital or recommend others do so until full details are openly provided and validated.