WikiFX

Reply

In my experience reviewing and evaluating OSTOUL as a prospective broker, I found it challenging to get clear, direct information about inactivity fees. The available context gives little detail regarding their trading conditions, including fee structures for inactive accounts. As someone who prioritizes transparency and risk management, this lack of clarity is a significant concern for me. In the past, I have seen brokers use inactivity fees as a way to generate revenue from dormant accounts, sometimes with terms that aren't made clear upfront. However, with OSTOUL, there simply isn't enough published information on whether they impose inactivity fees or the terms such charges might entail. Given OSTOUL's unregulated status, my caution increases substantially. Without oversight from a credible regulator, traders like myself face heightened risks, especially regarding unexpected costs or changes to terms. The absence of specific details on fees—including inactivity charges—means I cannot confidently advise that accounts are free from such charges. I would urge anyone considering OSTOUL to request explicit information about all potential account fees directly from their support before depositing any funds. For me, the lack of fee transparency and external regulation are red flags that make it difficult to recommend OSTOUL, especially for those concerned about hidden or unexpected costs.