WikiFX

Reply

Based on my careful review of 4e, one serious concern for me as a trader is the lack of transparency around their fee structure, particularly regarding account inactivity. The WikiFX data explicitly flags a “high inactive fee” as a con, but frustratingly, there are no precise details available on the exact amount charged or the specific conditions that would trigger this fee. In my experience, this opacity makes it very difficult to effectively manage my trading costs or plan longer-term engagement with the broker. With reputable, regulated brokers, I always expect to find a clearly disclosed, itemized list of all possible fees—including inactivity charges—within their terms of service. The absence of such disclosure at 4e is particularly troubling because inactivity fees can quickly erode account balances, especially if I’m not actively monitoring or using the account. Given 4e’s unregulated status and unclear business practices, I can only take a highly cautious approach: if a high inactivity fee is even mentioned as a risk, it’s safer to assume the risk is real and significant, even if the triggering circumstances aren’t plainly spelled out. Without full transparency, I simply can’t recommend using the platform where such cost risks are left ambiguous.