In my experience as a trader, I treat the lack of solid regulatory oversight as a primary red flag when considering any broker, and Neomarkets is no exception. Despite statements about being registered or regulated by certain entities, what matters for me is independent verification from established, reputable financial authorities. After looking into Neomarkets, I could not confirm any current, valid regulation by recognized bodies. The platform operates out of Kazakhstan and claims some regulatory association, but these claims are not independently backed—meaning the broker is effectively unregulated. This unregulated status introduces significant risk from my perspective, as there’s no external agency ensuring client protection, transparency, or the handling of client funds. With unregulated brokers, rights and recourse in the event of a dispute are extremely limited, which is something I think every trader needs to weigh carefully. While some users have shared positive trading experiences, I personally would not overlook the importance of regulatory protection, as it forms the backbone of trust in the trading environment. Ultimately, for my capital and peace of mind, I prefer brokers with verifiable, strong regulatory credentials from well-known authorities.