WikiFX

Sagot

After reviewing the available information on Linear, I need to be direct about the practical limitations I experienced. There is no explicit mention of inactivity fees in the provided data. In my experience as a trader with many brokers, the absence of clear information about such fees is already a risk factor worth considering. Brokers regulated in the UK, like Linear, should generally provide detailed disclosures regarding all account-related charges—including inactivity or dormancy fees—on their official platforms or legal documents. However, the WikiFX context makes it apparent that some aspects of Linear’s business raise caution. For instance, there’s a “Suspicious Scope of Business” label, a “High potential risk” warning, and mentions that a recent visit in the UK found no physical office—a significant transparency issue for me. These factors all contribute to uncertainty around ancillary costs, including potential inactivity fees. For my own practice, I would not assume that the lack of public disclosure means there are no fees. Before committing funds, I would always reach out directly to their customer service and request a comprehensive list of account charges in writing. In the absence of transparent evidence, I would proceed with heightened caution and recommend others do the same. For traders who value cost clarity, I believe this lack of certainty is a serious consideration.