天眼评分
JaneStreet
https://www.janestreet.com/
官方网址
评分指数
影响力
影响力
A
影响力指数 NO.1
联系方式
单核
1G
40G
1M*ADSL
- 该交易商WikiFX实勘差评已达到2条,请注意风险,谨防受害!
浏览 JaneStreet 的用户还浏览了..
VT Markets
搜索来源
投放语言
市场分析
素材投放
官网鉴定
janestreet.com
52.73.180.213服务器所在地美国
备案号--主要访问国家/地区--域名创建时间0001-01-01网站名称WHOIS.GANDI.NET所属公司GANDI SAS
关系族谱
相关企业
公司简介
| JaneStreet 评论摘要 | |
| 成立时间 | 2000 |
| 注册国家/地区 | 美国 |
| 监管 | 在香港由SFC(许可证号BAL548)监管期货;在英国的FCA许可证(编号486546)目前标记为“已超过” |
| 产品和服务 | 做市商、ETF、债券、股票、期权、量化研究、技术解决方案 |
| 交易平台 | 内部交易系统、基于OCaml的软件 |
| 客户支持 | 纽约:+1 646 759 6000 |
| 伦敦:+44 (0)20 3787 3200 | |
| 香港:+852 3900 7300 | |
| 阿姆斯特丹:+31 (0)20 794 3100 | |
| 新加坡:+65 6393 6000 | |
| 媒体:media@janestreet.com | |
JaneStreet 信息
Jane Street是一家私人拥有的美国流动性提供商和量化交易企业,成立于2000年。该公司专注于期货市场技术创新、量化研究和交易所交易基金(ETF)。它不适用于零售交易,并且缺乏任何公共服务或平台,如MT4或MT5。

优点和缺点
| 优点 | 缺点 |
| 在香港由SFC监管 | 不适用于零售或个人投资者 |
| 在全球200多个电子交易场所运营 | 不支持MT4/MT5或传统交易账户 |
| 在量化策略和内部技术堆栈方面具有强大的专业知识 | 在英国的FCA许可证被标记为“已超过”(不活跃) |
JaneStreet 是否合法?
Jane Street在香港由证券期货事务监察委员会(SFC)监管,许可证号为BAL548,用于期货合约交易。在英国,它曾获得金融行为监管局(FCA)颁发的投资咨询服务许可证号486546,但目前状态为“已超过”,意味着不再有效。


产品和服务
Jane Street提供创新的技术服务、量化研究和交易。在200多个电子交易场所运营,是一家重要的全球流动性提供商,以其在机器学习驱动的量化策略、股票、债券、期权和ETF方面的实力而闻名。
| 类别 | 提供的产品/服务 |
| 交易 | 在200多个交易场所进行ETF、股票、债券、期权和其他资产类别的做市 |
| 量化研究 | 基于机器学习的模型开发、策略设计、大规模数据分析 |
| 技术 | 使用OCaml的内部软件和基础设施(例如交易、风险、分析工具) |
| 全球业务 | 在纽约、伦敦、香港、新加坡、阿姆斯特丹等地开展业务 |
| 合作 | 跨职能整合交易、研究和技术团队,解决市场问题 |

公司办公室
Jane Street在世界上一些最具活力的金融中心设有办事处,包括纽约、伦敦、香港、新加坡、阿姆斯特丹和芝加哥。

交易平台
| 交易平台 | 支持 | 可用设备 | 适合何种交易者 |
| 内部交易系统 | ✔ | 桌面 | 使用专有策略的机构交易者 |
| 基于OCaml的软件 | ✔ | 桌面 | 量化开发人员和技术驱动的交易团队 |
| MT4/MT5 | ❌ | – | - |

企业画像
- 10-15年
- 香港监管
- 英国监管
- 期货合约交易
- 投资咨询牌照
- 全球展业
- 涉嫌超限经营
- 高级风险隐患
Wiki问答
Is it possible to trade commodities such as Gold (XAU/USD) and Crude Oil through JaneStreet?
Based on my experience as an independent trader and a careful review of the information about JaneStreet, I must approach this with extra caution due to its unique business model. JaneStreet is not designed as a traditional retail brokerage platform; rather, it is an institutional liquidity provider and quantitative trading firm. They operate on over 200 electronic venues globally, focusing on market making in products like ETFs, equities, bonds, options, and futures. However, there is no direct evidence or indication that they specifically facilitate retail trading of commodities like Gold (XAU/USD) or Crude Oil for individual clients. Further, JaneStreet lacks traditional retail platforms such as MT4 or MT5, and does not support common public account types. Their technology is primarily proprietary and designed for institutional participants, not for standard retail access. While their institutional activities may involve trading commodities indirectly via ETFs or derivatives on global exchanges, private retail traders—including myself—would not be able to access or trade commodities like Gold or Crude Oil directly through JaneStreet. In my view, JaneStreet is not an appropriate choice for retail commodity trading, and I would advise seeking out a retail-focused, well-regulated broker if your aim is to trade instruments such as XAU/USD or Crude Oil more directly and transparently.
Does JaneStreet impose any fees when you deposit or withdraw funds?
From my direct analysis and experience as a trader, it’s important to clarify that JaneStreet isn’t set up as a typical retail forex broker where deposit and withdrawal processes are straightforward or relevant. JaneStreet is a large-scale liquidity provider and quantitative trading firm focused on institutional and technical market-making activities, as outlined by its regulatory profile in Hong Kong and inactive license status in the UK. The core of its business is not structured for individual or retail traders, and there aren’t any public-facing platforms or accounts, such as MT4 or MT5, through which typical funding transactions would take place. Given this structure, questions about deposit or withdrawal fees in the retail broker sense simply don’t apply to JaneStreet. There’s no retail onboarding, no personal trading accounts, and no client-facing portal for routine deposits or withdrawals. Any fund movement would be managed through negotiated institutional relationships, not a standardized client service interface where transparent retail fees could be published or charged. For me, as someone always vigilant about fees and transparency, this absence alone indicates that JaneStreet is not an option for those seeking the typical account funding experience found at traditional forex brokers. Anyone considering engagement should be highly cautious and understand that JaneStreet serves a completely different segment of the financial industry.
How do JaneStreet's swap fees (overnight financing charges) stack up against those offered by other brokers?
As an experienced forex trader, it’s crucial for me to assess all operational aspects of a broker—swap fees included—before considering serious engagement. In the case of JaneStreet, it’s important to clarify that the firm fundamentally differs from the typical retail forex brokers with which most traders are familiar. JaneStreet operates primarily as a global liquidity provider and quantitative trading enterprise, focusing on futures, ETFs, bonds, and other institutional-grade instruments. There’s no support for traditional retail trading platforms like MT4 or MT5, nor does JaneStreet offer conventional trading accounts or products directly accessible to individuals. Given this institutional structure, JaneStreet doesn’t publicly list swap fees or overnight financing charges as one would expect from retail forex brokers. In my experience, these costs, when present at the institutional level, are generally embedded within specific contract terms or reflected through negotiated arrangements with counterparties—not through standardized, transparent charges that individual traders can benchmark. Without retail account offerings or published fee schedules, it’s not possible to directly compare JaneStreet’s swap rates to those of retail-focused brokers. For traders like myself seeking transparency and cost predictability in overnight financing, brokers with explicit retail services and clear swaps documentation are preferable. If knowing and comparing swap rates is a priority in my decision-making, the absence of this detail at JaneStreet means it’s not a suitable broker for my typical retail or even advanced personal trading needs. Always, caution and verification of costs remain essential, especially with institutionally focused firms.
Does JaneStreet charge a commission per lot on their ECN or raw spread account types?
From my experience and based strictly on the available context, JaneStreet is fundamentally different from typical forex brokers that cater to retail traders. Unlike brokers offering ECN or raw spread accounts—which usually charge commissions per lot traded—JaneStreet does not appear to have such account structures or pricing mechanisms. This firm is a large, institutional liquidity provider and quantitative trading company. Their operations focus on market making and proprietary quantitative strategies across various asset classes, including equities, bonds, options, and ETFs, primarily for institutions and not individual investors. There is no mention in the public information of ECN or raw spread accounts, nor of any standard commission-per-lot model. Their technology stack is in-house and designed for their proprietary use; they do not support widely-used retail trading platforms like MT4 or MT5. Because of this structure, standard fee schedules are unlikely to apply the way they do for retail brokers, making it essential to highlight that individual traders would not interact with JaneStreet in the conventional account/commission sense. For me, as someone who often looks for transparent fee information before using any new platform, the absence of these details—and the very nature of JaneStreet's business—would mean they are not a viable option for retail trading, and there should be no expectation of familiar forex commission models. As always, I urge anyone considering a firm to thoroughly understand its target clients, regulation, and business model before proceeding, as the risks and access may not be appropriate for individual portfolio needs.
