天眼评分
PAXOS
https://www.paxos.com/zh/
官方网址
评分指数
影响力
影响力
B
影响力指数 NO.1
联系方式
暂未查证到有效监管信息,请注意风险!
- 经查证,该交易商当前暂无有效外汇监管,请注意风险!
浏览 PAXOS 的用户还浏览了..
PU Prime
AVATRADE
VT Markets
搜索来源
投放语言
市场分析
素材投放
官网鉴定
- paxos.com 165.227.73.110服务器所在地- 美国 备案号--主要访问国家/地区- 台湾 域名创建时间2002-09-07网站名称WHOIS.REGISTRAR.AMAZON.COM所属公司AMAZON REGISTRAR, INC.
关系族谱
相关企业
公司简介
| PAXOS评论摘要 | |
| 成立时间 | 2002 | 
| 注册国家/地区 | 美国 | 
| 监管 | 无监管 | 
| 服务 | 加密货币经纪、钱包和交易基础设施、稳定币支付、全球支付和支付、稳定币发行 | 
| 交易平台 | Web | 
| 客户支持 | 在线聊天 | 
| 电话:(855) 880 5275 | |
PAXOS信息
PAXOS成立于2002年,总部位于美国。尽管在数字资产和区块链基础设施市场存在,但并未受到FCA、ASIC或CySEC等主要金融监管机构的监管。通过其应用程序接口-first平台,该公司为机构提供加密货币经纪、钱包和交易基础设施、稳定币发行以及跨境支付解决方案。

优缺点
| 优点 | 缺点 | 
| 提供广泛的服务 | 无监管 | 
| 支持跨境支付和支付 | 手续费上的信息有限 | 
| 基于应用程序接口的平台适合开发人员和企业 | 
PAXOS是否合法?
PAXOS在美国注册,尽管不受任何重要的美国金融监管机构监管。此外,它也没有来自FCA(英国)、ASIC(澳大利亚)和CySEC(塞浦路斯)等全球知名监管机构的许可。请注意风险!

根据WHOIS域名查询,域名paxos.com于2002年9月7日首次注册,目前仍在运营。将于2025年9月7日到期,最近更新日期为2024年8月3日。该域名受到“客户删除禁止”、“客户转移禁止”和“客户更新禁止”等限制。

服务
PAXOS为数字资产提供受监管的金融基础设施,包括加密货币经纪、钱包和交易技术、稳定币发行以及跨境支付。

交易平台
| 交易平台 | 支持 | 可用设备 | 
| Paxos Web | ✔ | Web | 
| 移动应用 | ✘ | – | 
| 桌面软件 | ✘ | – | 
存款和提款
Paxos 并未公开披露其稳定币支付平台的任何存款或提款手续费。使用其基于应用程序接口的基础设施的企业在发送或接收稳定币交易时可能会产生网络(gas)费用,具体费用取决于所使用的区块链。
| 方法 | 费用(来自 Paxos) | 处理时间 | 
| 稳定币 存款 | 仅网络(gas)费用 | 几乎即时(在链上) | 
| 稳定币 提款 | 仅网络(gas)费用 | 几乎即时(在链上) | 
| 法币 转换(美元) | 未提及 | 根据银行/支付渠道而异 | 

企业画像
- 5-10年
- 监管牌照存疑
- 区域性交易商
- 高级风险隐患
Wiki问答
How much is the least amount you need to deposit to start a live trading account with PAXOS?
As a trader with years of experience, one of the first things I look for in any broker is transparent information about account minimums and deposit procedures. When evaluating PAXOS, I found that there is a significant lack of clarity regarding the minimum deposit required to open a live trading account. The available information does not specify a minimum deposit amount for individual traders, which for me raises some immediate flags about openness and reliability. This is especially concerning given that established, reputable brokers typically state such basics clearly. Even more troubling are the broader risks associated with PAXOS: the company is not regulated by any major financial authority, and there are multiple public reports of users experiencing withdrawal issues, frozen funds, and poor customer service. For me, these points are not minor inconveniences—they are critical warnings in the forex and crypto landscape, where client protections are paramount. The absence of clear deposit minimums, combined with unaddressed regulatory concerns and serious user complaints, makes me personally very cautious. If I don’t know the minimum required to fund an account, I strongly question the safety of making any deposit at all. In my opinion, proceeding with a broker lacking such basic transparency is extremely risky.
Have you experienced any drawbacks with PAXOS's customer support or noticed any issues with the stability of their platform?
Drawing from my experience as a trader, I approach every broker with a critical eye, prioritizing regulatory security and the quality of support above all. With PAXOS, several issues immediately stood out. First, the total lack of regulation by any major financial authority set off significant alarm bells for me. This regulatory void not only raises concerns around operational transparency but leaves users with little recourse should disputes arise—a risk I simply cannot overlook. Regarding customer support, my interactions left much to be desired. There have been reports, which I fully corroborate, of delayed or unresponsive customer service. This is particularly worrisome when dealing with any platform handling financial assets or large sums. Communication is fundamental for building trust, especially when login issues or withdrawal requests arise, and I noticed definite shortcomings here. Stability of the platform is equally crucial. Reports about account access problems—such as being unable to log in or access funds—underline a worrying lack of reliability. For me, even isolated incidents involving frozen funds or site inaccessibility are unacceptable, as quick, consistent access to my assets is non-negotiable. In summary, my direct experience, combined with recurring user reports, reinforces a conservative stance. I have found the customer support lacking and the platform’s operational reliability questionable, making it unsuitable for my trading needs.
Can you tell me the typical spread for EUR/USD when trading on a standard account with PAXOS?
As an experienced forex trader, I rely heavily on transparency around trading conditions—especially when it comes to spreads for major pairs like EUR/USD. In my thorough research and careful review of PAXOS, I found no reliable or specific information publicly provided regarding typical spreads for EUR/USD or any other forex pair on their standard account. This lack of clarity raises an immediate concern for me, as transparent fee structures are essential in evaluating potential trading costs and managing risk. When a broker does not disclose such fundamental details, I find it difficult to accurately assess their competitiveness or even basic suitability for forex trading. Additionally, PAXOS operates without regulation from recognized financial authorities, which compounds my caution. I noticed multiple user complaints about withdrawal issues and problematic experiences with the platform, and these, combined with the absence of spread information, make it impossible for me to share any precise figures. For me, this level of opaqueness is a significant red flag: before committing any funds or considering live trading, I require brokers to publish clear data on spreads and all other trading costs. In the case of PAXOS, I have not been able to verify the EUR/USD spread, and that alone would make me pause before proceeding further.
What major risks or downsides should I watch out for when using PAXOS?
From my perspective as an experienced forex trader, there are several serious risks and issues with PAXOS that I simply cannot overlook. The most critical red flag for me is the complete absence of regulation by respected financial authorities such as the FCA, ASIC, or CySEC. In the world of trading, I’ve learned that oversight by credible regulators is fundamental to ensuring fair practices and customer protection. Without such regulation, users have almost no recourse if things go wrong. Looking deeper, there are recurring patterns in user reports that worry me. Multiple users have complained about being unable to withdraw their funds, with some even detailing that they were asked to pay significant additional deposits just to access their own money. Experiences like having accounts frozen, being locked out of the platform, or being pressured to deposit more funds suggest operational practices I would not trust with my assets or data. Additionally, even as PAXOS presents itself as a provider of digital asset and payment infrastructure, ambiguity surrounds its fee structure and business scope. Lack of transparency on these basics increases uncertainty and, in my view, exposes users to unforeseen costs or changes in conditions. Overall, based on these factors, I am extremely cautious toward PAXOS and do not find it a trustworthy venue for trading or asset management. For me, these risks outweigh any potential benefits.
用户评价 7
 
 你要评价的内容
请输入...














 
 
pra
泰国
骗局,无法提款💀
曝光
M4613
台湾
詐盜用圖片,假投資投資 要出金還要繳保證金50%
曝光
robby2244
美国
不能再登录网站了。
曝光
东风破
印尼
PAXOS官网自相矛盾、不专业,说明这个经纪商很不靠谱。最让我恼火的是,他们疯狂地打电话给我要存款!
中评
robby2244
美国
客户服务从未回复过,我无法使用我的资金,现在我无法登录我的帐户,但我知道我的登录名和密码是正确的。
曝光
robby2244
美国
1100 被冻结,不能出金,让我投资的人告诉我这是一个骗局,我对此无能为力,甚至我都没法去监管机构。
曝光
robby2244
美国
我试图取出我的资金,但从来没有成功过,我对此无能为力。
曝光