WikiFX Valentine's Message | Trade Safely, Together Every Step of the Way
In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:London/Australia-based broker ThinkMarkets faces a court order to transfer $4.28 million into its UK client account following a legal dispute with a Turkish client, Abdurrahman Suzgun, accused of "swap abuse" and amidst the broker's recent financial challenges and cancelled merger plans.

ThinkMarkets, a Retail FX and CFDs broker headquartered in London and Australia, has been served with a court order from the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales – London Circuit Commercial Court. This court order, amounting to USD $4.28 million, is directed at both of ThinkMarkets operational entities, namely TF Global Markets (UK) Ltd and TF Global Markets (Aust) Pty Ltd. The interim mandatory injunction stipulates that ThinkMarkets must transfer the specified amount, $4,280,818.88, into its client money segregated account in the UK by 4:30 pm on Monday, January 15.
The issuance of this court order follows a legal dispute involving ThinkMarkets and a former client, Abdurrahman Suzgun, from Turkey. In late 2021, ThinkMarkets had communicated to Mr. Suzgun about the debiting of USD $4.28 million from his account, prompting the legal action taken by the aggrieved party against the broker.
Presiding over the matter, His Honour Judge Richard Pearce's order explicitly warns that failure to comply may lead to contempt of court, with potential consequences such as imprisonment, fines, or asset seizure for ThinkMarkets, its directors, or officers.

To provide context to the dispute, Abdurrahman Suzgun, a trader based in Turkey specializing in forex and precious metals, initiated a business relationship with ThinkMarkets UK in 2019. Ostensibly, the purpose was to hedge positions in his physical precious metals business. ThinkMarkets facilitated two accounts for Mr. Suzgun—a standard trading account and a Swap-Free Account, commonly offered by FX/CFD brokers for clients adhering to Islamic law, which prohibits interest charges.
In mid-2021, ThinkMarkets accused Mr. Suzgun of breaching the agreement by engaging in “swap abuse.” The broker contended that the Swap-Free Account was intended for exceptional circumstances and short-term positions, not for over 90% of trades carried for more than a day, as alleged by ThinkMarkets. The broker asserted potential earnings of over USD $1.6 million in Swap Charges if these trades had occurred in the regular account. Subsequently, ThinkMarkets debited $4.28 million labelled as “disputed funds” and an additional $370,000 classified as “undisputed funds” from Mr. Suzgun's account. The funds were transferred to ThinkMarkets Australia, the liquidity provider to ThinkMarkets UK.
Mr. Suzgun vehemently refuted ThinkMarkets' allegations, insisting that all trades adhered to the agreement's terms. Additionally, he claimed that, post-dispute, ThinkMarkets transferred his accounts to its Bermudan entity to evade FCA jurisdiction, despite his objections.
Although the UK courts are scheduled to hear the matter in February, the recent court order mandates ThinkMarkets to return the entire sum of “disputed funds” to its client money segregated account in the UK. This development follows ThinkMarkets' recent attempts to go public through a merger with FG Acquisition Corp. on the Toronto Stock Exchange. The deal, initially valued at approximately USD $160 million, was cancelled in December after FG's public shareholders opted for refunds, revealing ThinkMarkets' financial challenges and prompting auditors to issue a “going concern” warning.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support

Did you face losses due to a sudden change in the trading price on the datian platform? Were your transaction records deleted by the Hong Kong-based forex broker? Did the broker liquidate your trading account multiple times despite not reaching the stage where it mandated this move? Have you experienced heavy slippage on the trading platform? Concerned by these issues, traders have complained about the broker online. We will let you know of these with attached screenshots in this datian review article. Keep reading!

Did you face constant rejections of your fund withdrawal applications by TopstepFX? Have you been denied withdrawals in the name of hedging? Did you witness an account block without any clear explanation from the forex broker? There have been numerous user claims against TopstepFX regarding its withdrawals, payout delays and other issues. In the TopstepFX review article, we have investigated the top complaints against the US-based forex broker. Keep reading!

When choosing a broker, the first question is always about safety and legitimacy. Is my capital safe? For Mazi Finance, the answer is clear and worrying: Mazi Finance is an unregulated broker. While the company, MaziMatic Financial Services LTD, is registered in the offshore location of Saint Lucia, this business registration does not replace strong financial regulation from a top-level authority. Independent analysis from regulatory watchdogs shows a very low trust score, made worse by official warnings from government financial bodies and many user complaints about serious problems. This article provides a clear, fact-based analysis of the Mazi Finance regulation status. Our goal is to break down the facts and present the risks clearly, helping you make an informed decision and protect your capital.